These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33170526)

  • 1. Recent Developments in Species Sensitivity Distribution Modeling.
    Fox DR; van Dam RA; Fisher R; Batley GE; Tillmanns AR; Thorley J; Schwarz CJ; Spry DJ; McTavish K
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Feb; 40(2):293-308. PubMed ID: 33170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
    Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
    Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions?
    Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):13131-13136. PubMed ID: 32924457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SSDs revisited: part II-practical considerations in the development and use of application factors applied to species sensitivity distributions.
    Belanger SE; Carr GJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1526-1541. PubMed ID: 30994956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mean Species Abundance as a Measure of Ecotoxicological Risk.
    Hoeks S; Huijbregts MAJ; Douziech M; Hendriks AJ; Oldenkamp R
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2304-2313. PubMed ID: 32786097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SSDs Revisited: Part I-A Framework for Sample Size Guidance on Species Sensitivity Distribution Analysis.
    Carr GJ; Belanger SE
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1514-1525. PubMed ID: 30994946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages.
    Grist EP; Leung KM; Wheeler JR; Crane M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Jul; 21(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 12109754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relevance of generic and site-specific species sensitivity distributions in the current risk assessment procedures for copper and zinc.
    Bossuyt BT; Muyssen BT; Janssen CR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 15720010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of four methods for bioavailability-based risk assessment of mixtures of Cu, Zn, and Ni in freshwater.
    Van Regenmortel T; Nys C; Janssen CR; Lofts S; De Schamphelaere KAC
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Aug; 36(8):2123-2138. PubMed ID: 28112432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of a mixture of copper, nickel, and zinc on the structure and function of a freshwater planktonic community.
    Van Regenmortel T; Van de Perre D; Janssen CR; De Schamphelaere KAC
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2380-2400. PubMed ID: 29870110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. QSAR-Based Estimation of Species Sensitivity Distribution Parameters: An Exploratory Investigation.
    Hoondert RPJ; Oldenkamp R; de Zwart D; van de Meent D; Posthuma L
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Dec; 38(12):2764-2770. PubMed ID: 31553801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-dependent species sensitivity distributions.
    Fox DR; Billoir E
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Feb; 32(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 23161611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of vanadium water quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life with relevance to the Athabasca Oil Sands region using species sensitivity distributions.
    Schiffer S; Liber K
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Nov; 36(11):3034-3044. PubMed ID: 28636253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliable and Representative Estimation of Extrapolation Model Application in Deriving Water Quality Criteria for Antibiotics.
    Cao L; Liu R; Wang L; Liu Y; Li L; Wang Y
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2023 Jan; 42(1):191-204. PubMed ID: 36342347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.
    Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Species Sensitivity Distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data.
    Aldenberg T; Rorije E
    Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 23614542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian and time-independent species sensitivity distributions for risk assessment of chemicals.
    Grist EP; O'Hagan A; Crane M; Sorokin N; Sims I; Whitehouse P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 16433377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.