These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33170526)

  • 41. [Species sensitive distribution for aquatic biota exposed to triazophos].
    Chen BY; Zheng SR; Niu XC; Zhao JS
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Apr; 32(4):1101-7. PubMed ID: 21717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Chemical Aquatic Fate and Effects database (CAFE), a tool that supports assessments of chemical spills in aquatic environments.
    Bejarano AC; Farr JK; Jenne P; Chu V; Hielscher A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1576-86. PubMed ID: 26497000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The relative sensitivity of macrophyte and algal species to herbicides and fungicides: an analysis using species sensitivity distributions.
    Giddings JM; Arts G; Hommen U
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):308-18. PubMed ID: 23229339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Plant species sensitivity distributions for ozone exposure.
    van Goethem TM; Azevedo LB; van Zelm R; Hayes F; Ashmore MR; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Pollut; 2013 Jul; 178():1-6. PubMed ID: 23501341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Estimating population-level HC5 for copper using a species sensitivity distribution approach.
    Iwasaki Y; Hayashi TI; Kamo M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1396-402. PubMed ID: 23417717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Studies on ecological risk assessment of pesticide using species sensitivity distribution.
    Nagai T
    J Pestic Sci; 2017 Aug; 42(3):124-131. PubMed ID: 30363390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Variability in the dynamics of mortality and immobility responses of freshwater arthropods exposed to chlorpyrifos.
    Rubach MN; Crum SJ; Van den Brink PJ
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 May; 60(4):708-21. PubMed ID: 20711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Validation of the species sensitivity distribution in retrospective risk assessment of herbicides at the river basin scale-the Scheldt river basin case study.
    Jesenska S; Nemethova S; Blaha L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Sep; 20(9):6070-84. PubMed ID: 23532537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Development and application of a species sensitivity distribution for temperature-induced mortality in the aquatic environment.
    de Vries P; Tamis JE; Murk AJ; Smit MG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Dec; 27(12):2591-8. PubMed ID: 18611083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Probabilistic ecological risk assessment of heavy metals using the sensitivity of resident organisms in four Korean rivers.
    Park J; Lee S; Lee E; Noh H; Seo Y; Lim H; Shin H; Lee I; Jung H; Na T; Kim SD
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109483. PubMed ID: 31362159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Framework for Optimizing Selection of Interspecies Correlation Estimation Models to Address Species Diversity and Toxicity Gaps in an Aquatic Database.
    Bejarano AC; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 51(14):8158-8165. PubMed ID: 28636817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.
    Liu Y; Wu F; Mu Y; Feng C; Fang Y; Chen L; Giesy JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():35-57. PubMed ID: 24609517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do predictions from Species Sensitivity Distributions match with field data?
    Smetanová S; Bláha L; Liess M; Schäfer RB; Beketov MA
    Environ Pollut; 2014 Jun; 189():126-33. PubMed ID: 24657606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Derivation of water quality criteria of phenanthrene using interspecies correlation estimation models for aquatic life in China.
    Wu J; Liu Z; Yan Z; Yi X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Jun; 22(12):9457-63. PubMed ID: 25608455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The relative sensitivity of freshwater species to antimony(III): Implications for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments.
    Obiakor MO; Tighe M; Wang Z; Ezeonyejiaku CD; Pereg L; Wilson SC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):25276-25290. PubMed ID: 28929352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ecological hazard assessment via species sensitivity distributions: The non-exchangeability issue.
    Migliorati S; Monti GS; Vighi M
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):875-892. PubMed ID: 33491802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of environmental risks from toxic and nontoxic stressors; a proposed concept for a risk-based management tool for offshore drilling discharges.
    Smit MG; Jak RG; Rye H; Frost TK; Singsaas I; Karman CC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 18232721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions.
    Duboudin C; Ciffroy P; Magaud H
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Feb; 23(2):489-99. PubMed ID: 14982398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Making species salinity sensitivity distributions reflective of naturally occurring communities: using rapid testing and Bayesian statistics.
    Hickey GL; Kefford BJ; Dunlop JE; Craig PS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Nov; 27(11):2403-11. PubMed ID: 18522453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Species sensitivity distribution for chlorpyrifos to aquatic organisms: Model choice and sample size.
    Zhao J; Chen B
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Mar; 125():161-9. PubMed ID: 26701839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.