These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33171275)
1. Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews. Thomas J; McDonald S; Noel-Storr A; Shemilt I; Elliott J; Mavergames C; Marshall IJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():140-151. PubMed ID: 33171275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning reduced workload for the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register: development and evaluation of the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Classifier. Shemilt I; Noel-Storr A; Thomas J; Featherstone R; Mavergames C Syst Rev; 2022 Jan; 11(1):15. PubMed ID: 35065679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cochrane Centralised Search Service showed high sensitivity identifying randomized controlled trials: A retrospective analysis. Noel-Storr AH; Dooley G; Wisniewski S; Glanville J; Thomas J; Cox S; Featherstone R; Foxlee R J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():142-150. PubMed ID: 32798713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Citation screening using crowdsourcing and machine learning produced accurate results: Evaluation of Cochrane's modified Screen4Me service. Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Affengruber L; Gartlehner G J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():23-31. PubMed ID: 33007457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Both clinical trial register and electronic bibliographic database searches were needed to identify randomized clinical trials for systematic reviews: an evaluation study. Kaul T; Colombijn JMT; Vernooij RWM; Spijker R; Idema DL; Huis In 't Veld LF; Damen JAA; Hooft L J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 May; 169():111300. PubMed ID: 38402998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials. Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Elliott J; Steele E; Shemilt I; Mavergames C; Wisniewski S; McDonald S; Murano M; Glanville J; Foxlee R; Beecher D; Ware J; Thomas J J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():130-139. PubMed ID: 33476769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach. Wallace BC; Noel-Storr A; Marshall IJ; Cohen AM; Smalheiser NR; Thomas J J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Nov; 24(6):1165-1168. PubMed ID: 28541493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide. Marshall IJ; Noel-Storr A; Kuiper J; Thomas J; Wallace BC Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):602-614. PubMed ID: 29314757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies. Royle P; Waugh N BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews. Qin X; Liu J; Wang Y; Liu Y; Deng K; Ma Y; Zou K; Li L; Sun X J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():121-129. PubMed ID: 33485929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation. Hausner E; Metzendorf MI; Richter B; Lotz F; Waffenschmidt S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30563471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials. Al-Hajeri AA; Fedorowicz Z; Amin FA; Eisinga A Saudi Med J; 2006 Apr; 27(4):526-30. PubMed ID: 16598332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review. Crumley ET; Wiebe N; Cramer K; Klassen TP; Hartling L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. Royle P; Milne R Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 15095765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]