376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33172647)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study.
Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Osman RB; Alharbi NM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the superimposition reference area on intraoral scanning accuracy in a partially dentate maxilla.
Negm EE; Patel M; Ryan P
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):189.e1-189.e11. PubMed ID: 38556406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
Gurpinar B; Tak O
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
Diker B; Tak Ö
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
