BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33173108)

  • 1. Numerical study of the effect of channel aspect ratio on particle focusing in acoustophoretic devices.
    Spigarelli L; Vasile NS; Pirri CF; Canavese G
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19447. PubMed ID: 33173108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustofluidics 20: applications in acoustic trapping.
    Evander M; Nilsson J
    Lab Chip; 2012 Nov; 12(22):4667-76. PubMed ID: 23047553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Focusing of sub-micrometer particles and bacteria enabled by two-dimensional acoustophoresis.
    Antfolk M; Muller PB; Augustsson P; Bruus H; Laurell T
    Lab Chip; 2014 Aug; 14(15):2791-9. PubMed ID: 24895052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic focusing with engineered node locations for high-performance microfluidic particle separation.
    Fong EJ; Johnston AC; Notton T; Jung SY; Rose KA; Weinberger LS; Shusteff M
    Analyst; 2014 Mar; 139(5):1192-200. PubMed ID: 24448925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separation of 300 and 100 nm Particles in Fabry-Perot Acoustofluidic Resonators.
    Sehgal P; Kirby BJ
    Anal Chem; 2017 Nov; 89(22):12192-12200. PubMed ID: 29039191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diffraction-based acoustic manipulation in microchannels enables continuous particle and bacteria focusing.
    Devendran C; Choi K; Han J; Ai Y; Neild A; Collins DJ
    Lab Chip; 2020 Aug; 20(15):2674-2688. PubMed ID: 32608464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple and inexpensive micromachined aluminum microfluidic devices for acoustic focusing of particles and cells.
    Gautam GP; Burger T; Wilcox A; Cumbo MJ; Graves SW; Piyasena ME
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2018 May; 410(14):3385-3394. PubMed ID: 29651523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement of size-based particle separation throughput in slanted spiral microchannel by modifying outlet geometry.
    Mihandoust A; Maleki-Jirsaraei N; Rouhani S; Safi S; Alizadeh M
    Electrophoresis; 2020 Mar; 41(5-6):353-359. PubMed ID: 32012295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous particle separation in a microfluidic channel via standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW).
    Shi J; Huang H; Stratton Z; Huang Y; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2009 Dec; 9(23):3354-9. PubMed ID: 19904400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A numerical study of microparticle acoustophoresis driven by acoustic radiation forces and streaming-induced drag forces.
    Muller PB; Barnkob R; Jensen MJ; Bruus H
    Lab Chip; 2012 Nov; 12(22):4617-27. PubMed ID: 23010952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of acoustic streaming patterns around oscillating sharp edges.
    Nama N; Huang PH; Huang TJ; Costanzo F
    Lab Chip; 2014 Aug; 14(15):2824-36. PubMed ID: 24903475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focusing of sub-micrometer particles in microfluidic devices.
    Zhang T; Hong ZY; Tang SY; Li W; Inglis DW; Hosokawa Y; Yalikun Y; Li M
    Lab Chip; 2020 Jan; 20(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 31720655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lateral and cross-lateral focusing of spherical particles in a square microchannel.
    Choi YS; Seo KW; Lee SJ
    Lab Chip; 2011 Feb; 11(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 21072415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separation of sub-micron particles from micron particles using acoustic fluid relocation combined with acoustophoresis.
    Gautam GP; Gurung R; Fencl FA; Piyasena ME
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2018 Oct; 410(25):6561-6571. PubMed ID: 30046870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical study of acoustophoretic motion of particles in a PDMS microchannel driven by surface acoustic waves.
    Nama N; Barnkob R; Mao Z; Kähler CJ; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2015 Jun; 15(12):2700-9. PubMed ID: 26001199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inertia-Acoustophoresis Hybrid Microfluidic Device for Rapid and Efficient Cell Separation.
    Kim U; Oh B; Ahn J; Lee S; Cho Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective particle and cell capture in a continuous flow using micro-vortex acoustic streaming.
    Collins DJ; Khoo BL; Ma Z; Winkler A; Weser R; Schmidt H; Han J; Ai Y
    Lab Chip; 2017 May; 17(10):1769-1777. PubMed ID: 28394386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced viscoelastic focusing of particle in microchannel.
    Fan LL; Zhao Z; Tao YY; Wu X; Yan Q; Zhe J; Zhao L
    Electrophoresis; 2020 Jun; 41(10-11):973-982. PubMed ID: 31900948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards the automation of micron-sized particle handling by use of acoustic manipulation assisted by microfluidics.
    Oberti S; Neild A; Möller D; Dual J
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Nov; 48(6-7):529-36. PubMed ID: 18649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent advances in particle and droplet manipulation for lab-on-a-chip devices based on surface acoustic waves.
    Wang Z; Zhe J
    Lab Chip; 2011 Apr; 11(7):1280-5. PubMed ID: 21301739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.