208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33174098)
1. Robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy provides superior surgical resection.
Ali AM; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Perry Y; Linden PA; Towe CW
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6329-6334. PubMed ID: 33174098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomies for esophageal cancer by hospital volume: an analysis of the national cancer database.
Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Linden PA; Towe CW
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3802-3810. PubMed ID: 32789587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with superior survival, lymphadenectomy and surgical margins: propensity matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Worrell SG; Bachman KC; Sarode AL; Perry Y; Linden PA; Towe CW
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Oct; 33(10):. PubMed ID: 32206801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Timing of Robotic Esophagectomy Adoption Impact Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes?
Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Gray KE; Linden PA; Worrell SG; Towe CW
J Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 260():220-228. PubMed ID: 33360305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing quality of lymphadenectomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a US-based analysis.
Odetoyinbo K; Bachman K; Worrell S; Gray K; Linden P; Towe C
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Oct; 35(10):. PubMed ID: 35039833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection and thoracic duct resection for early-stage oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Matsuda S; Kawakubo H; Takeuchi H; Hayashi M; Mayanagi S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Br J Surg; 2020 May; 107(6):705-711. PubMed ID: 32077101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yüksel S; Topal U; Songür MZ; Çalıkoğlu İ; Karaköse E; Ercan E; Teke Z; Bektaş H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2024 Jan; 20(1):410-416. PubMed ID: 38554354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Goldman DA; Sima C; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Molena D; Bott M; Atkinson T; Jones DR; Rusch VW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):920-928. PubMed ID: 31026433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lower Rates of Unplanned Conversion to Open in Robotic Approach to Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Silva JP; Putnam LR; Wu J; Ding L; Samakar K; Abel S; Nguyen JD; Dobrowolsky AB; Bildzukewicz NA; Lipham JC
Am Surg; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2583-2594. PubMed ID: 35611934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: unclear benefits compared to traditional transhiatal esophagectomy.
Keeney-Bonthrone TP; Abbott KL; Haley C; Karmakar M; Hawes AM; Chang AC; Lin J; Lynch WR; Carrott PW; Lagisetty KH; Orringer MB; Reddy RM
J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):883-891. PubMed ID: 34581956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
