These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33174098)

  • 1. Robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy provides superior surgical resection.
    Ali AM; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Perry Y; Linden PA; Towe CW
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6329-6334. PubMed ID: 33174098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomies for esophageal cancer by hospital volume: an analysis of the national cancer database.
    Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Linden PA; Towe CW
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3802-3810. PubMed ID: 32789587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with superior survival, lymphadenectomy and surgical margins: propensity matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Worrell SG; Bachman KC; Sarode AL; Perry Y; Linden PA; Towe CW
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Oct; 33(10):. PubMed ID: 32206801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
    Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
    Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.
    Henckens SPG; Schuring N; Elliott JA; Johar A; Markar SR; Gantxegi A; Lagergren P; Hanna GB; Pera M; Reynolds JV; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS;
    Ann Surg; 2024 Aug; 280(2):267-273. PubMed ID: 38577796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Timing of Robotic Esophagectomy Adoption Impact Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes?
    Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Gray KE; Linden PA; Worrell SG; Towe CW
    J Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 260():220-228. PubMed ID: 33360305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
    Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing quality of lymphadenectomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a US-based analysis.
    Odetoyinbo K; Bachman K; Worrell S; Gray K; Linden P; Towe C
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Oct; 35(10):. PubMed ID: 35039833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection and thoracic duct resection for early-stage oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Matsuda S; Kawakubo H; Takeuchi H; Hayashi M; Mayanagi S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Br J Surg; 2020 May; 107(6):705-711. PubMed ID: 32077101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
    Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic-assisted esophagectomy with total mesoesophageal excision enhances R0-resection in patients with esophageal cancer: A single-center experience.
    Hoelzen JP; Fortmann L; Roy D; Szardenings C; Holstein M; Eichelmann AK; Rijcken E; Frankauer BE; Barth P; Wardelmann E; Pascher A; Juratli MA
    Surgery; 2024 Sep; 176(3):721-729. PubMed ID: 38944589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Yüksel S; Topal U; Songür MZ; Çalıkoğlu İ; Karaköse E; Ercan E; Teke Z; Bektaş H
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2024 Jan; 20(1):410-416. PubMed ID: 38554354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
    Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Goldman DA; Sima C; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Molena D; Bott M; Atkinson T; Jones DR; Rusch VW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):920-928. PubMed ID: 31026433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.