These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33174098)

  • 21. Lower Rates of Unplanned Conversion to Open in Robotic Approach to Esophagectomy for Cancer.
    Silva JP; Putnam LR; Wu J; Ding L; Samakar K; Abel S; Nguyen JD; Dobrowolsky AB; Bildzukewicz NA; Lipham JC
    Am Surg; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2583-2594. PubMed ID: 35611934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: unclear benefits compared to traditional transhiatal esophagectomy.
    Keeney-Bonthrone TP; Abbott KL; Haley C; Karmakar M; Hawes AM; Chang AC; Lin J; Lynch WR; Carrott PW; Lagisetty KH; Orringer MB; Reddy RM
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):883-891. PubMed ID: 34581956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Short-term outcome of totally minimally invasive versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
    Yu WQ; Zhai LX; Shi GD; Tang JY; Gao HJ; Wei YC
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3727-3733. PubMed ID: 37085421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
    Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rates and Predictors of Conversion to Open Surgery During Minimally Invasive Radical Cystectomy.
    Ko OS; Weiner AB; Smith ND; Meeks JJ
    J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):488-494. PubMed ID: 29620960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lasting symptoms and long-term health-related quality of life after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Eyck BM; Klevebro F; van der Wilk BJ; Johar A; Wijnhoven BPL; van Lanschot JJB; Lagergren P; Markar SR; Lagarde SM;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):582-588. PubMed ID: 34763951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Xu Y; Li XK; Cong ZZ; Zhou H; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Yi J; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Sep; 34(9):. PubMed ID: 33150401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Tan Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Fu J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):995-998. PubMed ID: 27680066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of NSQIP Database.
    Naffouje SA; Salloum RH; Khalaf Z; Salti GI
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):2001-2010. PubMed ID: 30927192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Na KJ; Kang CH; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 34542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.
    Khan M; Muzaffar A; Syed AA; Khatak S; Khan AR; Ashraf MI
    Updates Surg; 2016 Dec; 68(4):343-349. PubMed ID: 27629484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic Approach is Associated With a Lower Conversion Rate Compared to Laparoscopic Approach for Patients Undergoing Colectomy for T4b Colon Cancer. An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Kamel MK; Al-Qudah G; Shchatsko A; Keane CA; Serpa E; Nituica C; Blebea J; Marar O
    Surg Innov; 2023 Apr; 30(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 36069752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
    Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Single Center Experience after 44 Consecutive Cases.
    Bjelović M; Babič T; Gunjić D; Veselinović M; Špica B
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(7-8):410-5. PubMed ID: 26506750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.
    Mori K; Yamagata Y; Aikou S; Nishida M; Kiyokawa T; Yagi K; Yamashita H; Nomura S; Seto Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jul; 29(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 25809390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.