These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33174306)
1. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique. Guachetá L; Stevens CD; Tamayo Cardona JA; Murgueitio R J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):715-720. PubMed ID: 33174306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies. Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison. Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate. Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments. Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies. Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of firing and fabrication technique on the marginal fit of heat-pressed lithium disilicate veneers. Gakis P; Kontogiorgos E; Zeller S; Nagy WW J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):154-160. PubMed ID: 33341255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations. Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Load-bearing capacity, internal accuracy and time-efficiency of heat-pressed, milled and 3D-printed lithium disilicate ultra-thin occlusal veneers. Paqué PN; Gantner C; Mätzener KJ; Özcan M; Ioannidis A Dent Mater; 2024 Oct; 40(10):1602-1610. PubMed ID: 39079765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques. Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System. Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: Press vs. CAD/CAM. Azar B; Eckert S; Kunkela J; Ingr T; Mounajjed R Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e001. PubMed ID: 29364328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of marginal fit between press-fabricated and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns. Carlile RS; Owens WH; Greenwood WJ; Guevara PH Gen Dent; 2018; 66(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 29303757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Ceramic Laminate Veneers Fabricated with Four Different Computer-Aided Manufacturing Techniques. Anh NV; Ngoc VTN; Son TM; Hai HV; Tra NT Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Aug; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 39110959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique. Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Heat-Pressed and CAD/CAM Porcelain Laminate Veneers and a 2-Year Follow-Up. Yuce M; Ulusoy M; Turk AG J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29271526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]