203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33175230)
1. Prospective analysis of transvaginal mesh hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
Khandwala S; Cruff J
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2241-2247. PubMed ID: 33175230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal Mesh Compared With Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Kahn B; Varner RE; Murphy M; Sand P; Thomas S; Lipetskaia L; Chung DE; Mahdy A; Noblett K
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 139(6):975-985. PubMed ID: 35675593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reoperation for prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous mesh hysteropexy: characteristics of women choosing retreatment.
Napoe GS; Luchristt D; Sridhar A; Ellington D; Ridgeway B; Mazloomdoost D; Sung V; Ninivaggio C; Harvie H; Santiago-Lastra Y; Gantz MG; Zyczynski HM
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):255-261. PubMed ID: 36449027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Hickman LC; Tran MC; Paraiso MFR; Walters MD; Ferrando CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 34586437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthetic Graft Augmentation in Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Long-Term Objective and Subjective Outcomes.
Meyer I; McGwin G; Swain TA; Alvarez MD; Ellington DR; Richter HE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):614-21. PubMed ID: 26922879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of vaginal mesh hysteropexy for the management of advanced uterovaginal prolapse.
Khandwala S; Williams C; Reeves W; Dai J; Jayachandran C
J Reprod Med; 2014; 59(7-8):371-8. PubMed ID: 25098027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term follow-up of patients treated by transvaginal mesh repair for anterior prolapse.
Duraes M; Panel L; Cornille A; Courtieu C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():124-129. PubMed ID: 30269022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two years follow up of 270 patients treated by transvaginal mesh for anterior and/or apical prolapse.
Hugele F; Panel L; Farache C; Kashef A; Cornille A; Courtieu C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():16-22. PubMed ID: 27886523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion.
Achermann APP; Brazão ÉS; Riccetto CLZ; Palma PCR
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):856-857. PubMed ID: 30735341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel bilateral anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy technique for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via the vaginal route: a cohort study.
Naumann G; Börner C; Naumann LJ; Schröder S; Hüsch T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jul; 306(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 35288760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-Term Outcomes After Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Parallel Cohort Study (eVAULT).
Fitzgerald JJ; Sokol ER; Rardin CR; Cundiff GW; Paraiso MFR; Chou J; Gutman RE
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 28(6):e215-e221. PubMed ID: 35536663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison.
Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Urinary and sexual impact of pelvic reconstructive surgery for genital prolapse by surgical route. A randomized controlled trial.
de Tayrac R; Cosson M; Panel L; Compan C; Zemmache MZ; Bouvet S; Wagner L; Fatton B; Lamblin G
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):2021-2030. PubMed ID: 35044477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.
Milani AL; Damoiseaux A; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Withagen MIJ
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):847-858. PubMed ID: 29167974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies.
Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
