These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33175285)

  • 1. Does the "surprisingly popular" method yield accurate crowdsourced predictions?
    Rutchick AM; Ross BJ; Calvillo DP; Mesick CC
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Nov; 5(1):57. PubMed ID: 33175285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crowdsourced Perceptions of Human Behavior to Improve Computational Forecasts of US National Incident Cases of COVID-19: Survey Study.
    Braun D; Ingram D; Ingram D; Khan B; Marsh J; McAndrew T
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2022 Dec; 8(12):e39336. PubMed ID: 36219845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.
    Hamada D; Nakayama M; Saiki J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 33057843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promoting Erroneous Divergent Opinions Increases the Wisdom of Crowds.
    Barrera-Lemarchand F; Balenzuela P; Bahrami B; Deroy O; Navajas J
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Aug; 35(8):872-886. PubMed ID: 38865591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crowds Can Effectively Identify Misinformation at Scale.
    Martel C; Allen J; Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2024 Mar; 19(2):477-488. PubMed ID: 37594056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the Wisdom of the Crowd With Cognitive-Process Diversity: The Benefits of Aggregating Intuitive and Analytical Judgments.
    Keck S; Tang W
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1272-1282. PubMed ID: 32960747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mathematically aggregating experts' predictions of possible futures.
    Hanea AM; Wilkinson DP; McBride M; Lyon A; van Ravenzwaaij D; Singleton Thorn F; Gray C; Mandel DR; Willcox A; Gould E; Smith ET; Mody F; Bush M; Fidler F; Fraser H; Wintle BC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256919. PubMed ID: 34473784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The wisdom of many in one mind: improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping.
    Herzog SM; Hertwig R
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Feb; 20(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 19170937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The wisdom of select crowds.
    Mannes AE; Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Aug; 107(2):276-99. PubMed ID: 25090129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probabilistic social learning improves the public's judgments of news veracity.
    Guilbeault D; Woolley S; Becker J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247487. PubMed ID: 33690668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds.
    de Oliveira S; Nisbett RE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(9):2066-2071. PubMed ID: 29440376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The potential for effective reasoning guides children's preference for small group discussion over crowdsourcing.
    Richardson E; Keil FC
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1193. PubMed ID: 35075164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does discussion make crowds any wiser?
    Mercier H; Claidière N
    Cognition; 2022 May; 222():104912. PubMed ID: 34620497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of Social Information by Human Groups.
    Granovskiy B; Gold JM; Sumpter DJ; Goldstone RL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):469-93. PubMed ID: 26189568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The wisdom of the inner crowd in three large natural experiments.
    van Dolder D; van den Assem MJ
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Jan; 2(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 30980050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of naturalistic driving scene categorization Judgments from crowdsourcing.
    Cabrall CDD; Lu Z; Kyriakidis M; Manca L; Dijksterhuis C; Happee R; de Winter J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():25-33. PubMed ID: 28911877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying machine influence over human forecasters.
    Abeliuk A; Benjamin DM; Morstatter F; Galstyan A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15940. PubMed ID: 32994447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Group discussion improves lie detection.
    Klein N; Epley N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7460-5. PubMed ID: 26015581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Democratic forecast: Small groups predict the future better than individuals and crowds.
    Dezecache G; Dockendorff M; Ferreiro DN; Deroy O; Bahrami B
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Sep; 28(3):525-537. PubMed ID: 35878072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.