These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33175852)

  • 1. Semantic knowledge influences visual working memory in adults and children.
    Starr A; Srinivasan M; Bunge SA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241110. PubMed ID: 33175852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the effects of perceptual complexity versus conceptual meaning on the object benefit in visual working memory.
    Thibeault AML; Stojanoski B; Emrich SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):453-468. PubMed ID: 38291307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic and functional relationships among objects increase the capacity of visual working memory.
    O'Donnell RE; Clement A; Brockmole JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 29648871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects.
    Kaiser D; Stein T; Peelen MV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1784-90. PubMed ID: 25896215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual memory benefits from prolonged encoding time regardless of stimulus type.
    Li X; Xiong Z; Theeuwes J; Wang B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 32437186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why does visual working memory ability improve with age: More objects, more feature detail, or both? A registered report.
    Forsberg A; Adams EJ; Cowan N
    Dev Sci; 2023 Mar; 26(2):e13283. PubMed ID: 35611884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.
    Luck SJ; Vogel EK
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6657):279-81. PubMed ID: 9384378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No Fixed Limit for Storing Simple Visual Features: Realistic Objects Provide an Efficient Scaffold for Holding Features in Mind.
    Chung YH; Brady TF; Störmer VS
    Psychol Sci; 2023 Jul; 34(7):784-793. PubMed ID: 37227786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.
    Williams M; Woodman GF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1206-20. PubMed ID: 22409182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.
    Guo Z; Niu M; Wang Q
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7560. PubMed ID: 33828108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instant Effects of Semantic Information on Visual Perception.
    Enge A; Süß F; Abdel Rahman R
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(26):4896-4906. PubMed ID: 37286353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic influence on visual working memory of object identity and location.
    Hu R; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104891. PubMed ID: 34481197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory.
    Markov YA; Utochkin IS; Brady TF
    J Vis; 2021 Mar; 21(3):18. PubMed ID: 33729452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Greater Visual Working Memory Capacity for Visually Matched Stimuli When They Are Perceived as Meaningful.
    Asp IE; Störmer VS; Brady TF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 33(5):902-918. PubMed ID: 34449847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preexisting semantic representation improves working memory performance in the visuospatial domain.
    Rudner M; Orfanidou E; Cardin V; Capek CM; Woll B; Rönnberg J
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 26800983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Array heterogeneity prevents catastrophic forgetting in infants.
    Zosh JM; Feigenson L
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():365-80. PubMed ID: 25543889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of meaning in visual working memory: Real-world objects, but not simple features, benefit from deeper processing.
    Brady TF; Störmer VS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):942-958. PubMed ID: 33764123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occipital, parietal, and frontal cortices selectively maintain task-relevant features of multi-feature objects in visual working memory.
    Yu Q; Shim WM
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():97-107. PubMed ID: 28559190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.
    Chunharas C; Rademaker RL; Sprague TC; Brady TF; Serences JT
    J Vis; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30634185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual working memory declines when more features must be remembered for each object.
    Oberauer K; Eichenberger S
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1212-27. PubMed ID: 23716004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.