These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33176013)

  • 41. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy.
    Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robotic versus vaginal radical trachelectomy for reproductive-aged patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study.
    Nica A; Benseler A; Parbhakar A; Fortin LT; Heyns M; Lee M; Covens A; Plante M; May T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 185():95-100. PubMed ID: 38377763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.
    van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.
    Fusegi A; Kanao H; Tsumura S; Murakami A; Abe A; Aoki Y; Nomura H
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e5. PubMed ID: 36424702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.
    Kanao H; Fusegi A; Omi M; Youssefzadeh AC; Nomura H; Matsuo K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e27. PubMed ID: 36562133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prospective assessment of urinary and bowel symptoms, and sexual function between laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy.
    Dogan NU; Kohler C; Pfiffer T; Plaikner A; Le X; Favero G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Mar; 31(3):484-489. PubMed ID: 33649018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Non-radical surgery for small early-stage cervical cancer. Is it time?
    Bouchard-Fortier G; Reade CJ; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):624-7. PubMed ID: 24480237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Novel Technique to Minimize Contamination for Cervical Cancer Surgery Patients.
    Martino MA; Bixel K; Johnson AM; Wejkszner T; Jacobs A; Lazaro J; Makarova E; Thomas MB; Fowler J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1624-1630. PubMed ID: 31931144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
    Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
    Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
    Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Case Report and Review of Literature.
    Api M; Boza A; Ceyhan M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 26631768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.