168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33176877)
1. The effect of hearing protection devices on speech intelligibility of Persian employees.
Karami M; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Hamidi Nahrani M
BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):529. PubMed ID: 33176877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
Chiu CC; Wan TJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment.
Rocha CH; Lisboa G; Padilha FYOMM; Rabelo CM; Samelli AG
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Jun; 28(2):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 33502290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. To measure the impact of hearing protectors on the perception of speech in noise.
Hiselius P; Edvall N; Reimers D
Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 1():S3-8. PubMed ID: 25549165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Training in using earplugs or using earplugs with a higher than necessary noise reduction rating? A randomized clinical trial.
Salmani Nodoushan M; Mehrparvar AH; Torab Jahromi M; Safaei S; Mollasadeghi A
Int J Occup Environ Med; 2014 Oct; 5(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews.
Van Wijngaarden SJ; Rots G
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1037-44. PubMed ID: 11718509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of hearing protection devices on spatial awareness in complex listening environments.
Snapp HA; Millet B; Schaefer-Solle N; Rajguru SM; Ausili SA
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280240. PubMed ID: 36634110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
Abel SM; Odell P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
Giguère C; Kunov H
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
