BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33177357)

  • 21. Number of evaluated lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds evaluation in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: numerology or valid indicators of patient outcome?
    Lahat G; Lubezky N; Gerstenhaber F; Nizri E; Gysi M; Rozenek M; Goichman Y; Nachmany I; Nakache R; Wolf I; Klausner JM
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 14(1):254. PubMed ID: 27687517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Proposal of the optimal numbers of examined and positive lymph nodes to the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for 758 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.
    Wu R; Zhang G; Feng J; Zhang L; Yang Z
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234464. PubMed ID: 32544187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Equipping the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor grade: a recursive partitioning analysis.
    Chen YT; Huang ZP; Zhou ZW; He MM
    Med Oncol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):122. PubMed ID: 27730526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lymph node metastases in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictors of disease recurrence and survival.
    Morales-Oyarvide V; Rubinson DA; Dunne RF; Kozak MM; Bui JL; Yuan C; Qian ZR; Babic A; Da Silva A; Nowak JA; Khalaf N; Brais LK; Welch MW; Zellers CL; Ng K; Chang DT; Miksad RA; Bullock AJ; Tseng JF; Swanson RS; Clancy TE; Linehan DC; Findeis-Hosey JJ; Doyle LA; Hornick JL; Ogino S; Fuchs CS; Hezel AF; Koong AC; Wolpin BM
    Br J Cancer; 2017 Dec; 117(12):1874-1882. PubMed ID: 28982112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III?
    Song M; Yoon SB; Lee IS; Hong TH; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Lee MA; Jung ES; Choi MG
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():62-69. PubMed ID: 30326370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.
    Seeruttun SR; Xu L; Wang F; Yi X; Fang C; Liu Z; Wang W; Zhou Z
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Jun; 39(1):32. PubMed ID: 31182160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Rowan DJ; Hartley CP; Aldakkak M; Christians KK; Evans DB; Tsai S; Hagen CE
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jun; 46():151485. PubMed ID: 32172219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Greater lymph node retrieval and lymph node ratio impacts survival in resected pancreatic cancer.
    Mirkin KA; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
    J Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 220():12-24. PubMed ID: 29180173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The number and ratio of positive lymph nodes affect pancreatic cancer patient survival after neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Fischer LK; Katz MH; Lee SM; Liu L; Wang H; Varadhachary GR; Wolff RA; Lee JE; Maitra A; Roland CL; Fleming JB; Estrella J; Rashid A; Wang H
    Histopathology; 2016 Jan; 68(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 25945396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node status in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm - Time to consider a reclassification?
    Linder S; Holmberg M; Engstrand J; Ghorbani P; Sparrelid E
    Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 41():101735. PubMed ID: 35287096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. At least 16 lymph nodes are recommended to examine during pancreaticoduodenectomy in ampullary adenocarcinoma.
    Zhang X; Sun C; Zhao L; Niu P; Li Z; Fei H; Wang W; Guo C; Che X; Chen Y; Zhao D
    Am J Cancer Res; 2023; 13(1):340-351. PubMed ID: 36777520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The number of lymph nodes identified in a simple pancreatoduodenectomy specimen: comparison of conventional vs orange-peeling approach in pathologic assessment.
    Adsay NV; Basturk O; Altinel D; Khanani F; Coban I; Weaver DW; Kooby DA; Sarmiento JM; Staley C
    Mod Pathol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 18820663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Proposal of the minimal number of retrieved regional lymph nodes for accurate staging of distal bile duct cancer and clinical validation of the three-tier lymph node staging system (AJCC 8th edition).
    Kang JS; Higuchi R; He J; Yamamoto M; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Han Y; Son D; Lee S; Choi YJ; Byun Y; Kim H; Kwon W; Kim SW; Park T; Jang JY
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Feb; 27(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 31633308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Kassardjian A; Stanzione N; Donahue TR; Wainberg ZA; Damato L; Wang HL
    Pancreas; 2019 Aug; 48(7):876-882. PubMed ID: 31268985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determining the optimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer: An analysis using the nodal staging score model.
    Hua J; Zhang B; Xu J; Liu J; Ni Q; He J; Zheng L; Yu X; Shi S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 30685327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prognostic impact of nodal statuses in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Fukuda Y; Asaoka T; Maeda S; Hama N; Miyamoto A; Mori M; Doki Y; Nakamori S
    Pancreatology; 2017; 17(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 28122676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Does prognosis depend on mode of lymph node invasion?
    Buc E; Couvelard A; Kwiatkowski F; Dokmak S; Ruszniewski P; Hammel P; Belghiti J; Sauvanet A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24923739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of the 7 th and 8 th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System in Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Associated PDAC : A Multi-institutional Analysis.
    Margonis GA; Pulvirenti A; Morales-Oyarvide V; Buettner S; Andreatos N; Kamphues C; Beyer K; Wang J; Kreis ME; Cameron JL; Weiss MJ; Soares K; Fernández-Del Castillo C; Allen PJ; Wolfgang CL
    Ann Surg; 2023 Apr; 277(4):681-688. PubMed ID: 34793353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study.
    Guan X; Jiao S; Wen R; Yu G; Liu J; Miao D; Wei R; Zhang W; Hao L; Zhou L; Lou Z; Liu S; Zhao E; Wang G; Zhang W; Wang X
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2241-2248. PubMed ID: 37428195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8
    Chen HY; Wang X; Zhang H; Liu XB; Tan CL
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(46):6752-6766. PubMed ID: 31857777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.