These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33177574)

  • 1. Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object.
    Sasin E; Fougnie D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19499. PubMed ID: 33177574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection within working memory based on a color retro-cue modulates alpha oscillations.
    Poch C; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():133-137. PubMed ID: 28958909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down suppression of negative features applies flexibly contingent on visual search goals.
    Forstinger M; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1120-1147. PubMed ID: 38627277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do working memory-driven attention shifts speed up visual awareness?
    Pan Y; Cheng QP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2425-33. PubMed ID: 21837542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention.
    Delvenne JF; Cleeremans A; Laloyaux C
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 20178921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures.
    Jeanneret S; Bartsch LM; Vergauwe E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1486-1498. PubMed ID: 37127814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory.
    Li Q; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):450-63. PubMed ID: 25338537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.
    Bocincova A; Johnson JS
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():196-209. PubMed ID: 30508678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1768-79. PubMed ID: 21533921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diverting the focus of attention in working memory through a perceptual task.
    Gao Z; Li J; Wu J; Dai A; Liao H; Shen M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):876-905. PubMed ID: 35084929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of location and visual features on visual object memory.
    Sun HM; Gordon RD
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1049-57. PubMed ID: 21156869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unloading and reloading working memory: attending to one item frees capacity.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1237-56. PubMed ID: 24730737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object-based selection in visual working memory.
    Lin YT; Kong G; Fougnie D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):1961-1971. PubMed ID: 34258730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
    Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.