299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33177794)
81. Prevalence and coexistence of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, TP53, and APC mutations in Indian colorectal cancer patients: Next-generation sequencing-based cohort study.
Jauhri M; Bhatnagar A; Gupta S; Bp M; Minhas S; Shokeen Y; Aggarwal S
Tumour Biol; 2017 Feb; 39(2):1010428317692265. PubMed ID: 28222664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Deep learning-based framework for slide-based histopathological image analysis.
Kosaraju S; Park J; Lee H; Yang JW; Kang M
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19075. PubMed ID: 36351997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. BRAF V600E mutation and KRAS codon 13 mutations predict poor survival in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.
Chen J; Guo F; Shi X; Zhang L; Zhang A; Jin H; He Y
BMC Cancer; 2014 Nov; 14():802. PubMed ID: 25367198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Deep Learning Predicts Molecular Subtype of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer from Conventional Histopathological Slides.
Woerl AC; Eckstein M; Geiger J; Wagner DC; Daher T; Stenzel P; Fernandez A; Hartmann A; Wand M; Roth W; Foersch S
Eur Urol; 2020 Aug; 78(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 32354610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. A promising deep learning-assistive algorithm for histopathological screening of colorectal cancer.
Ho C; Zhao Z; Chen XF; Sauer J; Saraf SA; Jialdasani R; Taghipour K; Sathe A; Khor LY; Lim KH; Leow WQ
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2222. PubMed ID: 35140318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Leveraging artificial intelligence to predict ERG gene fusion status in prostate cancer.
Dadhania V; Gonzalez D; Yousif M; Cheng J; Morgan TM; Spratt DE; Reichert ZR; Mannan R; Wang X; Chinnaiyan A; Cao X; Dhanasekaran SM; Chinnaiyan AM; Pantanowitz L; Mehra R
BMC Cancer; 2022 May; 22(1):494. PubMed ID: 35513774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Outcome-Supervised Deep Learning on Pathologic Whole Slide Images for Survival Prediction of Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Li B; Yang L; Zhang H; Li H; Jiang C; Yao Y; Cheng S; Zou B; Fan B; Dong T; Wang L
Mod Pathol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):100208. PubMed ID: 37149222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Deep learning image analysis quantifies tumor heterogeneity and identifies microsatellite instability in colon cancer.
Rubinstein JC; Foroughi Pour A; Zhou J; Sheridan TB; White BS; Chuang JH
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 127(3):426-433. PubMed ID: 36251352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Deep learning-based methods for classification of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer from HE-stained pathological images.
Zhang Y; Chen S; Wang Y; Li J; Xu K; Chen J; Zhao J
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Sep; 149(11):8877-8888. PubMed ID: 37150803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Accuracy of whole slide image based image analysis is adversely affected by preanalytical factors such as stained tissue slide and paraffin block age.
Shaker N; Sardana R; Hamasaki S; Nohle DG; Ayers LW; Parwani AV
J Pathol Inform; 2022; 13():100121. PubMed ID: 36268058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91.
Mondol RK; Millar EKA; Graham PH; Browne L; Sowmya A; Meijering E
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Apr; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 37174035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Computer-extracted features of nuclear morphology in hematoxylin and eosin images distinguish stage II and IV colon tumors.
Kumar N; Verma R; Chen C; Lu C; Fu P; Willis J; Madabhushi A
J Pathol; 2022 May; 257(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 35007352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Publicly available datasets of breast histopathology H&E whole-slide images: A scoping review.
Tafavvoghi M; Bongo LA; Shvetsov N; Busund LR; Møllersen K
J Pathol Inform; 2024 Dec; 15():100363. PubMed ID: 38405160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Predicting Mutational Status of Driver and Suppressor Genes Directly from Histopathology With Deep Learning: A Systematic Study Across 23 Solid Tumor Types.
Loeffler CML; Gaisa NT; Muti HS; van Treeck M; Echle A; Ghaffari Laleh N; Trautwein C; Heij LR; Grabsch HI; Ortiz Bruechle N; Kather JN
Front Genet; 2021; 12():806386. PubMed ID: 35251119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Comparative genomic signatures in young and old Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.
Wang F; Cheng H; Zhang X; Shan L; Bai B; Chen K; Lou F; Cao S; Wang H; Dai S
Cancer Med; 2021 Jul; 10(13):4375-4386. PubMed ID: 34041865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Deep learning-based prediction of molecular cancer biomarkers from tissue slides: A new tool for precision oncology.
Lee SH; Jang HJ
Clin Mol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 28(4):754-772. PubMed ID: 35443570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Deep learning identifies inflamed fat as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer.
Brockmoeller S; Echle A; Ghaffari Laleh N; Eiholm S; Malmstrøm ML; Plato Kuhlmann T; Levic K; Grabsch HI; West NP; Saldanha OL; Kouvidi K; Bono A; Heij LR; Brinker TJ; Gögenür I; Quirke P; Kather JN
J Pathol; 2022 Mar; 256(3):269-281. PubMed ID: 34738636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Deep learning-based prediction of treatment prognosis from nasal polyp histology slides.
Wang K; Ren Y; Ma L; Fan Y; Yang Z; Yang Q; Shi J; Sun Y
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2023 May; 13(5):886-898. PubMed ID: 36066094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Sampling Based Tumor Recognition in Whole-Slide Histology Image With Deep Learning Approaches.
Shen Y; Ke J
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(4):2431-2441. PubMed ID: 33630739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Enhancing deep learning based classifiers with inpainting anatomical side markers (L/R markers) for multi-center trials.
Kim KD; Cho K; Kim M; Lee KH; Lee S; Lee SM; Lee KH; Kim N
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 220():106705. PubMed ID: 35462346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
