These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33179215)

  • 1. A bimodal extension of the Eriksen flanker task.
    Ulrich R; Prislan L; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):790-799. PubMed ID: 33179215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification.
    Rouder JN; King JW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 12713244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A nonspatial sound modulates processing of visual distractors in a flanker task.
    Salagovic CA; Leonard CJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):800-809. PubMed ID: 33083988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Eriksen flanker effect revisited.
    Sanders AF; Lamers JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Jan; 109(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11766139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies.
    Li Z; Lou J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1836-1845. PubMed ID: 30993656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender differences on the semantic flanker task using transposed-letter target words.
    Judge J; Taylor PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2008-17. PubMed ID: 22524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.
    Paquet L; Craig GL
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Mar; 25(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 9099070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unveiling the influence of task-relevance of emotional faces on behavioral reactions in a multi-face context using a novel Flanker-Go/No-go task.
    Montalti M; Mirabella G
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20183. PubMed ID: 37978229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Diffusion Model Analysis of Object-Based Selective Attention in the Eriksen Flanker Task.
    Kelber P; Gierlich M; Göth J; Jeschke MG; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Exp Psychol; 2023 May; 70(3):155-170. PubMed ID: 37830767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher free testosterone level is associated with faster visual processing and more flanker interference in older men.
    Van Strien JW; Weber RF; Burdorf A; Bangma C
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2009 May; 34(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 19042092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers.
    Cosman JD; Mordkoff JT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 27854456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 2011464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of attentional focusing in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Servant M; Logan GD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2710-2721. PubMed ID: 31250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.
    Hübner R; Töbel L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214203. PubMed ID: 30921368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response-Category Conflict and Control Mode Determine Memory Performance for Distractors in a Flanker Paradigm.
    Muhmenthaler MC; Meier B
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 38223228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.
    Stins JF; Polderman JC; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jul; 3(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 20517524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolonged Interruption of Cognitive Control of Conflict Processing Over Human Faces by Task-Irrelevant Emotion Expression.
    Kim J; Kang MS; Cho YS; Lee SH
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1024. PubMed ID: 28676780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.