These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33179944)

  • 1. The validity of an isiZulu speech reception threshold test for use with adult isiZulu speakers.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Wilson WJ
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2020 Nov; 67(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 33179944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The internal and external consistency of a speech reception threshold test for isiZulu speakers with normal hearing sensitivity.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Wilson W
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 Jun; 65(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 30035610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a French-Language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Moulin A; Richard C
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):412-23. PubMed ID: 26808287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):656-663. PubMed ID: 29189432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
    De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of speech reception threshold materials for speakers of Taiwan Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Slade KB
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):449-58. PubMed ID: 17654087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay.
    Psillas G; Psifidis A; Antoniadou-Hitoglou M; Kouloulas A
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Sep; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 16420975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First-language raters' opinions when validating word recordings for a newly developed speech reception threshold test.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Wilson W
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 Mar; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the South African Spondaic and CID W-1 wordlists for measuring speech recognition threshold.
    Hanekom T; Soer M; Pottas L
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2015 Jun; 62(1):E1-10. PubMed ID: 26304218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of IOI-HA scores using speech reception thresholds and speech discrimination scores in quiet.
    Brännström KJ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Olsen SØ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 24828216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.