BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33180130)

  • 21. Anesthetic Management of Narcolepsy Patients During Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Hu S; Singh M; Wong J; Auckley D; Hershner S; Kakkar R; Thorpy MJ; Chung F
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):233-246. PubMed ID: 29257771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shared decision-making in end-stage renal disease: a protocol for a multi-center study of a communication intervention to improve end-of-life care for dialysis patients.
    Eneanya ND; Goff SL; Martinez T; Gutierrez N; Klingensmith J; Griffith JL; Garvey C; Kitsen J; Germain MJ; Marr L; Berzoff J; Unruh M; Cohen LM
    BMC Palliat Care; 2015 Jun; 14():30. PubMed ID: 26066323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving Communication About Serious Illness in Primary Care: A Review.
    Lakin JR; Block SD; Billings JA; Koritsanszky LA; Cunningham R; Wichmann L; Harvey D; Lamey J; Bernacki RE
    JAMA Intern Med; 2016 Sep; 176(9):1380-7. PubMed ID: 27398990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fast-track anesthetic techniques for ambulatory surgery.
    White PF; Eng M
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2007 Dec; 20(6):545-57. PubMed ID: 17989548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Current understanding of patients' attitudes toward and preparation for anesthesia: a review.
    Klafta JM; Roizen MF
    Anesth Analg; 1996 Dec; 83(6):1314-21. PubMed ID: 8942605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Communication tools for end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Oczkowski SJ; Chung HO; Hanvey L; Mbuagbaw L; You JJ
    Crit Care; 2016 Apr; 20():97. PubMed ID: 27059989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.
    Tamirisa NP; Goodwin JS; Kandalam A; Linder SK; Weller S; Turrubiate S; Silva C; Riall TS
    Health Expect; 2017 Dec; 20(6):1248-1253. PubMed ID: 28464430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Provider Tools for Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Discussions: A Systematic Review.
    Myers J; Cosby R; Gzik D; Harle I; Harrold D; Incardona N; Walton T
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2018 Aug; 35(8):1123-1132. PubMed ID: 29529884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Review article: Goals-of-care discussions for adult patients nearing end of life in emergency departments: A systematic review.
    Hanning J; Walker KJ; Horrigan D; Levinson M; Mills A
    Emerg Med Australas; 2019 Aug; 31(4):525-532. PubMed ID: 31044525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals.
    Atherton H; Sawmynaden P; Sheikh A; Majeed A; Car J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD007978. PubMed ID: 23152249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinician-to-Clinician Communication of Patient Goals of Care Within a Surgical Intensive Care Unit.
    Udelsman BV; Lee KC; Traeger LN; Lillemoe KD; Chang DC; Cooper Z
    J Surg Res; 2019 Aug; 240():80-88. PubMed ID: 30909068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interventions Guiding Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Systematic Review.
    Fahner JC; Beunders AJM; van der Heide A; Rietjens JAC; Vanderschuren MM; van Delden JJM; Kars MC
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2019 Mar; 20(3):227-248. PubMed ID: 30471947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring technologies in the acute care setting: A systematic review.
    Sprogis SK; Currey J; Considine J
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Aug; 28(15-16):2732-2744. PubMed ID: 31017338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.
    Taylor LJ; Nabozny MJ; Steffens NM; Tucholka JL; Brasel KJ; Johnson SK; Zelenski A; Rathouz PJ; Zhao Q; Kwekkeboom KL; Campbell TC; Schwarze ML
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Jun; 152(6):531-538. PubMed ID: 28146230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Postoperative Management for Patients With Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.
    Blum FE; Weiss GM; Cleveland JC; Weitzel NS
    Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2015 Dec; 19(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 26660056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy: A qualitative observation of talk about patients' preferences.
    Henselmans I; Van Laarhoven HW; Van der Vloodt J; De Haes HC; Smets EM
    Palliat Med; 2017 Jul; 31(7):625-633. PubMed ID: 28618897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore.
    Yek JL; Lee AK; Tan JA; Lin GY; Thamotharampillai T; Abdullah HR
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 28148256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.