139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33180173)
1. Training for next generation surgeons: a pilot study of robot-assisted hysterectomy managed by resident using dual console.
Klapczynski C; Sallée C; Tardieu A; Peschot C; Boutot M; Mohand N; Lacorre A; Margueritte F; Gauthier T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):981-986. PubMed ID: 33180173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Description of an initiation program to robotic in vivo gynecological surgery for junior surgeons.
Margueritte F; Sallée C; Legros M; Lacorre A; Piver P; Aubard Y; Tardieu A; Gauthier T
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Mar; 49(3):101627. PubMed ID: 31499279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulator training and residents' first laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Jokinen E; Mikkola TS; Härkki P
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4874-4882. PubMed ID: 31768724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Robotic Console Time a Surrogate for Resident Operative Autonomy?
Wang TN; Woelfel IA; Pieper H; Haisley KR; Meara MP; Chen XP
J Surg Educ; 2023 Nov; 80(11):1711-1716. PubMed ID: 37296003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Residents' Confidence in Performing Robotic Hysterectomy in Obstetrics and Gynecologic Training Programs.
Gressel GM; George K; Woodland MB; Banks E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1882-1888.e5. PubMed ID: 33962023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training.
Farivar BS; Flannagan M; Leitman IM
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 25451717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability in gynecologic case volume of obstetrician-gynecologist residents graduating from 2009 to 2017.
Hall EF; Raker CA; Hampton BS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):617.e1-617.e8. PubMed ID: 31765644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resident and Program Director Confidence in Resident Surgical Preparedness in Obstetrics and Gynecologic Training Programs.
Banks E; Gressel GM; George K; Woodland MB
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):369-376. PubMed ID: 32649501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and validation of a laparoscopic hysterectomy cuff closure simulation model for surgical training.
Tunitsky-Bitton E; Propst K; Muffly T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26640072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Training Gynecology Residents.
Moola D; Westermann LB; Pauls R; Eschenbacher M; Crisp C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 26680564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) Pilot Curriculum for robot assisted gynecological surgery.
Rusch P; Kimmig R; Lecuru F; Persson J; Ponce J; Degueldre M; Verheijen R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):415-420. PubMed ID: 29236172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Laparoscopic Suturing and Intracorporeal Knot Tying.
Chang OH; King LP; Modest AM; Hur HC
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 26597729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating a Detailed Case Log System to Standardize Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery Resident Training and Performance Evaluation.
Martin R; Hsu J; Soliman MK; Bastawrous AL; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 30665735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Surgical Teaching Take Time? Resident Participation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Freeman AH; Barrie A; Lyon L; Conell C; Garcia C; Littell RD; Powell CB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 28336363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in reported resident surgical experience in hysterectomy.
Washburn EE; Cohen SL; Manoucheri E; Zurawin RK; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1067-70. PubMed ID: 24907549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS).
Frederick PJ; Szender JB; Hussein AA; Kesterson JP; Shelton JA; Anderson TL; Barnabei VM; Guru K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 27780777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The robot doesn't lie: real-life validation of robotic performance metrics.
Quinn KM; Chen X; Runge LT; Pieper H; Renton D; Meara M; Collins C; Griffiths C; Husain S
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5547-5552. PubMed ID: 36266482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A resident robotic curriculum utilizing self-selection and a web-based feedback tool.
Merriman AL; Tarr ME; Kasten KR; Myers EM
J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):383-392. PubMed ID: 35696047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
