170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33180274)
1. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell counting to monitor swab efficiency.
Nolan M; Linacre A
J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 38380584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Qualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological environmental monitoring of surfaces.
Dalmaso G; Bini M; Paroni R; Ferrari M
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18661868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The double-swab technique versus single swabs for human DNA recovery from various surfaces.
Hedman J; Jansson L; Akel Y; Wallmark N; Gutierrez Liljestrand R; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102253. PubMed ID: 32007674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces.
Brown GS; Betty RG; Brockmann JE; Lucero DA; Souza CA; Walsh KS; Boucher RM; Tezak MS; Wilson MC; Rudolph T; Lindquist HD; Martinez KF
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1074-80. PubMed ID: 17897212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Swab materials and Bacillus anthracis spore recovery from nonporous surfaces.
Rose L; Jensen B; Peterson A; Banerjee SN; Srduino MJ
Emerg Infect Dis; 2004 Jun; 10(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 15207053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of rayon and flocked swabs for collection and transport of deep throat swabs for detection of bacteria causing whooping cough by multiplex real-time PCR assay.].
Pimenova AS; Borisova OY; Petrova MS; Gadua NT; Borisova AB; Kafarskaya LI; Afanasiev SS
Klin Lab Diagn; 2019; 64(8):493-496. PubMed ID: 31479606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recovery of mtDNA from unfired metallic ammunition components with an assessment of sequence profile quality and DNA damage through MPS analysis.
Holland MM; Bonds RM; Holland CA; McElhoe JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():86-96. PubMed ID: 30611826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FLOQSwab™: Optimisation of Procedures for the Recovery of Microbiological Samples from Surfaces.
Finazzi G; Losio MN; Varisco G
Ital J Food Saf; 2016 Jun; 5(3):5756. PubMed ID: 27853708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A practical study on direct PCR amplification using the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit on human bloodstains collected with microFLOQ™ Direct swabs.
Chong KWY; Wong Y; Ng BK; Lim WSH; Rosli AR; Syn CKC
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():43-50. PubMed ID: 31075566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct PCR Improves the Recovery of DNA from Various Substrates.
Templeton JE; Taylor D; Handt O; Skuza P; Linacre A
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1558-62. PubMed ID: 26264133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Swabbing for respiratory viral infections in older patients: a comparison of rayon and nylon flocked swabs.
Hernes SS; Quarsten H; Hagen E; Lyngroth AL; Pripp AH; Bjorvatn B; Bakke PS
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Feb; 30(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 20853014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
