These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33180543)

  • 1. Who influences meta-accuracy? It takes two to know the impressions we make.
    Elsaadawy N; Carlson EN; Human LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Jul; 121(1):201-214. PubMed ID: 33180543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining individual differences in metaperceptive accuracy using the social meta-accuracy model.
    Hater L; Elsaadawy N; Biesanz JC; Breil SM; Human LJ; Niemeyer LM; Tissera H; Back MD; Carlson EN
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Nov; 125(5):1119-1135. PubMed ID: 37721538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Knowing how you see me: Exploring meta-accuracy of personality, emotions and values and their links with relationship well-being among young adults.
    Tissera H; Lydon JE
    J Pers; 2022 Dec; 90(6):873-886. PubMed ID: 35067936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you.
    Carlson EN
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Aug; 111(2):250-64. PubMed ID: 27337137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do People Know How Their Romantic Partner Views Their Emotions? Evidence for Emotion Meta-Accuray and Links with Momentary Romantic Relationship Quality.
    Tissera H; Heyman JL; Human LJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Mar; 49(3):391-404. PubMed ID: 35067107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do accurate personality impressions benefit early relationship development? The bidirectional associations between accuracy and liking.
    Human LJ; Carlson EN; Geukes K; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 118(1):199-212. PubMed ID: 30138001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social anxiety and liking: Towards understanding the role of metaperceptions in first impressions.
    Tissera H; Gazzard Kerr L; Carlson EN; Human LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Oct; 121(4):948-968. PubMed ID: 32852974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do people think about the impressions they make on others? The attitudes and substance of metaperceptions.
    Elsaadawy N; Carlson EN; Chung JM; Connelly BS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Mar; 124(3):640-658. PubMed ID: 35901366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost of forming more accurate impressions: accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal.
    Biesanz JC; Human LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 20424106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metaperception in cyberspace.
    Sherman RC; End C; Kraan E; Cole A; Campbell J; Klausner J; Birchmeier Z
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2001 Feb; 4(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 11709901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is the structure of perceiver effects? On the importance of global positivity and trait-specificity across personality domains and judgment contexts.
    Rau R; Carlson EN; Back MD; Barranti M; Gebauer JE; Human LJ; Leising D; Nestler S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Mar; 120(3):745-764. PubMed ID: 31829655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpersonal perception in a social context.
    Malloy TE; Albright L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1990 Mar; 58(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 2324936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception.
    Hehman E; Sutherland CAM; Flake JK; Slepian ML
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Oct; 113(4):513-529. PubMed ID: 28481616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychologically Adjusted Persons Are Less Aware of How They Are Perceived by Others.
    Mosch A; Borkenau P
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Jul; 42(7):910-22. PubMed ID: 27229675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trait-specificity versus global positivity: A critical test of alternative sources of assumed similarity in personality judgments.
    Thielmann I; Rau R; Locke KD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Apr; 124(4):828-847. PubMed ID: 35446080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positivity in peer perceptions over time: Personality explains variation at zero-acquaintance, popularity explains differential change.
    Rau R; Carlson EN; Dufner M; Geukes K; Kraft L; Krause S; Nikoleizig L; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Aug; 123(2):423-443. PubMed ID: 35099200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential associations of knowing and liking with accuracy and positivity bias in person perception.
    Wessels NM; Zimmermann J; Biesanz JC; Leising D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 118(1):149-171. PubMed ID: 30335418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Through the looking glass clearly: accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals' first impressions.
    Human LJ; Biesanz JC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Feb; 100(2):349-64. PubMed ID: 21299315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-Other Agreement and Metaperception Accuracy Across the Big Five: Examining the Roles of Depression and Self-Esteem.
    Moritz D; Roberts JE
    J Pers; 2018 Apr; 86(2):296-307. PubMed ID: 28258585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of differential meta-accuracy: people understand the different impressions they make.
    Carlson EN; Furr RM
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Aug; 20(8):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19645692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.