These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33180569)

  • 1. Text recycling in STEM: A text-analytic study of recently published research articles.
    Anson IG; Moskovitz C
    Account Res; 2021 Aug; 28(6):349-371. PubMed ID: 33180569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Text recycling in health sciences research literature: a rhetorical perspective.
    Moskovitz C
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2017; 2():1. PubMed ID: 29451545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes toward text recycling in academic writing across disciplines.
    Hall S; Moskovitz C; Pemberton MA
    Account Res; 2018; 25(3):142-169. PubMed ID: 29394122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.
    Moskovitz C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):813-851. PubMed ID: 29546574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing.
    Burdine LK; de Castro Maymone MB; Vashi NA
    Int J Womens Dermatol; 2019 Jun; 5(2):134-136. PubMed ID: 30997390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comment on Cary Moskovitz' "Text Recycling in Health Sciences Literature: A Rhetorical Perspective".
    Roig M
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2017; 2():2. PubMed ID: 29451562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plagiarism in scientific research and publications and how to prevent it.
    Masic I
    Mater Sociomed; 2014 Apr; 26(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 24944543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-using text from one's own previously published papers: an exploratory study of potential self-plagiarism.
    Roig M
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Aug; 97(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16279303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plagiarism: Why is it such a big issue for medical writers?
    Das N; Panjabi M
    Perspect Clin Res; 2011 Apr; 2(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 21731858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do we handle self-plagiarism in submitted manuscripts?
    Supak-Smocić V; Bilić-Zulle L
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2013; 23(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 23894861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Text-based plagiarism in scientific writing: what Chinese supervisors think about copying and how to reduce it in students' writing.
    Li Y
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Jun; 19(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 22212356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: legitimate forms of research misconduct.
    Bruton SV
    Account Res; 2014; 21(3):176-97. PubMed ID: 24325212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.
    Ayodele FO; Yao L; Haron H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):357-382. PubMed ID: 29441445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plagiarism: A Bird's Eye View.
    Habibzadeh F
    J Korean Med Sci; 2023 Nov; 38(45):e373. PubMed ID: 37987104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Text recycling: acceptable or misconduct?
    Harriman S; Patel J
    BMC Med; 2014 Aug; 12():148. PubMed ID: 25127654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals.
    Owens JK; Nicoll LH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):356-363. PubMed ID: 30951246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encouraging Editorial Flexibility in Cases of Textual Reuse.
    Roig M
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(4):557-560. PubMed ID: 28244278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Authors, editors, and the signs, symptoms and causes of plagiarism.
    Shashok K
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 5(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 21957412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is reusing text from a protocol in the completed systematic review acceptable?
    Pieper D; Ge L; Abou-Setta A
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):131. PubMed ID: 33941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. APPS's stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no.
    Culley TM
    Appl Plant Sci; 2014 Jul; 2(7):. PubMed ID: 25202643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.