167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33180915)
1. Impact of inclusion rates of crossbred phenotypes and genotypes in nucleus selection programs.
See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33180915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.
See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34661671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.
Liu S; Yao T; Chen D; Xiao S; Chen L; Zhang Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):21. PubMed ID: 36977978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs.
Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Lopes PS; Bastiaansen JWM; Guimarães SEF
J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):817-829. PubMed ID: 29378008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs.
van Grevenhof IE; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):14. PubMed ID: 25887562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection.
Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
J Anim Sci; 2021 Aug; 99(8):. PubMed ID: 34223907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.
Kramer LM; Wolc A; Esfandyari H; Thekkoot DM; Zhang C; Kemp RA; Plastow G; Dekkers JCM
J Anim Sci; 2021 Oct; 99(10):. PubMed ID: 34558614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic correlations between growth performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred pigs raised in tropical and temperate climates1.
Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Komen H; Guimarães SEF; Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JWM
J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3648-3657. PubMed ID: 31278865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Including crossbred pigs in the genomic relationship matrix through utilization of both linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis.
Iversen MW; Nordbø Ø; Gjerlaug-Enger E; Grindflek E; Lopes MS; Meuwissen THE
J Anim Sci; 2017 Dec; 95(12):5197-5207. PubMed ID: 29293760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.
Bussiman F; Chen CY; Holl J; Bermann M; Legarra A; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37584978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine Learning Prediction of Crossbred Pig Feed Efficiency and Growth Rate From Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.
Tusell L; Bergsma R; Gilbert H; Gianola D; Piles M
Front Genet; 2020; 11():567818. PubMed ID: 33391339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.
Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R
Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
