These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A Hairy Situation: Laser Hair Removal after Oral Reconstruction. Shields BE; Moye MS; Bayon R; Sperry SM; Wanat KA Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Mar; 127(3):205-208. PubMed ID: 29291276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of Large Cervicofacial Defects With Expanded Island Superficial Temporal Artery Flaps and an 810-nm Diode Laser Hair Removal Technique. Li H; Xu X; Gao Y; Gu S; Xin H; Ren JY; Gu YH; Wang Z; Gu B; Zan T Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Feb; 88(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 34510079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical assessment of a new 755 nm diode laser for hair removal: Efficacy, safety and practicality in 56 patients. Royo J; Moreno-Moraga J; Trelles MA Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Apr; 49(4):355-360. PubMed ID: 27990665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The results of the diode laser hair reduction treatments after the IPL hair reduction treatments. Atta-Motte M; Zaleska I J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2020 Nov; 22(6-8):265-270. PubMed ID: 34107828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year follow-up results of hair removal using an 810 nm diode laser. Goldberg DJ J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Oct; 17(5):775-778. PubMed ID: 30251358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypertrichosis in Becker's nevus: effective low-fluence laser hair removal. Lapidoth M; Adatto M; Cohen S; Ben-Amitai D; Halachmi S Lasers Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 29(1):191-3. PubMed ID: 23558435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women. Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hairy intraoral flap--an unusual indication for laser epilation: a series of 5 cases and review of the literature. Shim TN; Abdullah A; Lanigan S; Avery C Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 49(7):e50-2. PubMed ID: 21306803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser epilation. Alajlan A; Shapiro J; Rivers JK; MacDonald N; Wiggin J; Lui H J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Jul; 53(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 15965427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: Side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal. Paasch U; Wagner JA; Paasch HW J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 25607745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal. Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term epilation with long-pulsed neodimium:YAG laser. Bencini PL; Luci A; Galimberti M; Ferranti G Dermatol Surg; 1999 Mar; 25(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 10193962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An efficacy comparison of hair removal utilizing a diode laser and an Nd:YAG laser system in Chinese women. Li R; Zhou Z; Gold MH J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2010 Oct; 12(5):213-7. PubMed ID: 20825259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser hair removal with alexandrite versus diode laser using four treatment sessions: 1-year results. Eremia S; Li C; Newman N Dermatol Surg; 2001 Nov; 27(11):925-9; discussion 929-30. PubMed ID: 11737125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]