These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33181680)

  • 1. Evaluation of the association between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer using Quantra software and the BI-RADS classification.
    Wang JM; Zhao HG; Liu TT; Wang FY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(46):e23112. PubMed ID: 33181680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of breast cancer risk by automated volumetric breast density measurement.
    Nara M; Fujioka T; Mori M; Aruga T; Tateishi U
    Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 35913644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.
    Regini E; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ghione G; Luparia A; Campanino PP; Bianchi CC; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):741-9. PubMed ID: 24610166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density.
    Destounis S; Johnston L; Highnam R; Arieno A; Morgan R; Chan A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):222-227. PubMed ID: 27824483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population: A retrospective observational study.
    Rahmat K; Ab Mumin N; Ramli Hamid MT; Fadzli F; Ng WL; Muhammad Gowdh NF
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(39):e22405. PubMed ID: 32991467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantra™ should be considered a tool for two-grade scale mammographic breast density classification.
    Ekpo EU; McEntee MF; Rickard M; Brennan PC; Kunduri J; Demchig D; Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20151057. PubMed ID: 26882045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive factors and mammographic density within the International Consortium of Mammographic Density: A cross-sectional study.
    O'Driscoll J; Burton A; Maskarinec G; Perez-Gomez B; Vachon C; Miao H; Lajous M; López-Ridaura R; Eliassen AH; Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Tamimi RM; Bertrand K; Kwong A; Ursin G; Lee E; Qureshi SA; Ma H; Vinnicombe S; Moss S; Allen S; Ndumia R; Vinayak S; Teo SH; Mariapun S; Fadzli F; Peplonska B; Nagata C; Stone J; Hopper JL; Giles G; Ozmen V; Aribal ME; Schüz J; Van Gils CH; Wanders JOP; Sirous R; Sirous M; Hipwell J; Kim J; Lee JW; Hartman M; Li J; Scott C; Chiarelli AM; Linton L; Pollan M; Flugelman AA; Salem D; Kamal R; Boyd N; Dos-Santos-Silva I; McCormack V; Mullooly M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Sep; 26(1):139. PubMed ID: 39350230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women.
    Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
    Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, "volumetric measurement", predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists.
    Oiwa M; Endo T; Suda N; Morita T; Sato Y; Kawasaki T; Ichihara S
    Breast Cancer; 2019 May; 26(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 30387023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Djuric O; Hélin V; Astley S; Mantellini P; Nitrosi A; Harkness EF; Gauthier E; Puliti D; Balleyguier C; Baron C; Gilbert FJ; Grivegnée A; Pattacini P; Michiels S; Delaloge S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19884. PubMed ID: 34615978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in mammographic density over time and the risk of breast cancer: An observational cohort study.
    Román M; Sala M; Baré M; Posso M; Vidal C; Louro J; Sánchez M; Peñalva L; Castells X;
    Breast; 2019 Aug; 46():108-115. PubMed ID: 31132476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in a Mediterranean population: a nested case-control study in the EPIC Florence cohort.
    Masala G; Ambrogetti D; Assedi M; Bendinelli B; Caini S; Palli D
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):467-473. PubMed ID: 28478611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
    Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of bariatric surgery on qualitative and quantitative breast density.
    Hassinger TE; Mehaffey JH; Knisely AT; Contrella BN; Brenin DR; Schroen AT; Schirmer BD; Hallowell PT; Harvey JA; Showalter SL
    Breast J; 2019 Nov; 25(6):1198-1205. PubMed ID: 31310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.