218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33182092)
1. Comprehensive binding analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and aryl hydrocarbon receptor via an integrated molecular modeling approach.
Xiao H; Mei N; Chi Q; Wang X
Chemosphere; 2021 Jan; 262():128356. PubMed ID: 33182092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of Ah receptor binding affinities of polybrominated diphenyl ethers via in silico molecular docking and 3D-QSAR.
Li X; Wang X; Shi W; Liu H; Yu H
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 23121134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive insight into the relationship between AhR binding property and toxicity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers by PLS-derived QSAR.
Gu C; Goodarzi M; Yang X; Bian Y; Sun C; Jiang X
Toxicol Lett; 2012 Feb; 208(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 22119921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Theoretical investigation of AhR binding property with relevant structural requirements for AhR-mediated toxicity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers.
Gu C; Cai J; Fan X; Bian Y; Yang X; Xia Q; Sun C; Jiang X
Chemosphere; 2020 Jun; 249():126554. PubMed ID: 32213394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Naphthoquinone-Dependent Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor.
Faber SC; Giani Tagliabue S; Bonati L; Denison MS
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32526934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.
Motto I; Bordogna A; Soshilov AA; Denison MS; Bonati L
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2868-81. PubMed ID: 21981577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved 3D-QSAR analyzes for the predictive toxicology of polybrominated diphenyl ethers with CoMFA/CoMSIA and DFT.
Gu C; Ju X; Jiang X; Yu K; Yang S; Sun C
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Sep; 73(6):1470-9. PubMed ID: 20006384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interactions of polybrominated diphenyl ethers with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway.
Peters AK; Nijmeijer S; Gradin K; Backlund M; Bergman A; Poellinger L; Denison MS; Van den Berg M
Toxicol Sci; 2006 Jul; 92(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 16601081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The tertiary structures of porcine AhR and ARNT proteins and molecular interactions within the TCDD/AhR/ARNT complex.
Orlowska K; Molcan T; Swigonska S; Sadowska A; Jablonska M; Nynca A; Jastrzebski JP; Ciereszko RE
J Mol Graph Model; 2016 Jun; 67():119-26. PubMed ID: 27288759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Docking-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) predicts binding affinities to aryl hydrocarbon receptor for polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls.
Yuan J; Pu Y; Yin L
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1453-8. PubMed ID: 23424013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and structure-based 3D-QSAR studies on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonistic activity of hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls.
Cao F; Li X; Ye L; Xie Y; Wang X; Shi W; Qian X; Zhu Y; Yu H
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 36(2):626-635. PubMed ID: 23850706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transitional States in Ligand-Dependent Transformation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor into Its DNA-Binding Form.
Soshilov AA; Motta S; Bonati L; Denison MS
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 32252465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Docking and 3D-QSAR studies on the Ah receptor binding affinities of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs).
Li F; Li X; Liu X; Zhang L; You L; Zhao J; Wu H
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Nov; 32(3):478-85. PubMed ID: 22004969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.
Odio C; Holzman SA; Denison MS; Fraccalvieri D; Bonati L; Franks DG; Hahn ME; Powell WH
Biochemistry; 2013 Mar; 52(10):1746-54. PubMed ID: 23394719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anti-androgen activity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers determined by comparative molecular similarity indices and molecular docking.
Yang W; Mu Y; Giesy JP; Zhang A; Yu H
Chemosphere; 2009 May; 75(9):1159-64. PubMed ID: 19324393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ligand binding and functional selectivity of L-tryptophan metabolites at the mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor (mAhR).
Nuti R; Gargaro M; Matino D; Dolciami D; Grohmann U; Puccetti P; Fallarino F; Macchiarulo A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Dec; 54(12):3373-83. PubMed ID: 25402742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ah receptor agonists in UV-exposed toluene solutions of decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) and in soils contaminated with polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs).
Olsman H; Hagberg J; Kalbin G; Julander A; van Bavel B; Strid A; Tysklind M; Engwall M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2006 May; 13(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 16758706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative In Vitro and In Silico Analysis of the Selectivity of Indirubin as a Human Ah Receptor Agonist.
Faber SC; Soshilov AA; Giani Tagliabue S; Bonati L; Denison MS
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Sep; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 30201897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In silico analysis of the interaction of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptors and dioxins to decipher isoform-, ligand-, and species-specific activations.
Hirano M; Hwang JH; Park HJ; Bak SM; Iwata H; Kim EY
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3795-804. PubMed ID: 25692546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hormone activity of hydroxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers on human thyroid receptor-beta: in vitro and in silico investigations.
Li F; Xie Q; Li X; Li N; Chi P; Chen J; Wang Z; Hao C
Environ Health Perspect; 2010 May; 118(5):602-6. PubMed ID: 20439171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
