These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3318419)
1. Problems in administration techniques and dose measurement that influence accuracy of i.v. drug delivery. Reilly KM Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Nov; 44(11):2545-50. PubMed ID: 3318419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Considering product features and costs in selecting a system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery. Rapp RP Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Nov; 44(11):2533-8. PubMed ID: 3318417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Features of i.v. devices and equipment that affect i.v. drug delivery. Leff RD Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Nov; 44(11):2530-3. PubMed ID: 3318416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Intravenous drug delivery in infants with limited i.v. access and fluid restriction. Zenk KE Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Nov; 44(11):2542-5. PubMed ID: 3120582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Proper use of drugs. Intravenous administration and catheters]. Thalamy B; Woronoff-Lemsi MC; Belon JP Soins; 2000; (642):55-6. PubMed ID: 11075211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting drug delivery by retrograde infusion. Berro MS; Edwards DL; Khalidi N; Sanders CA Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jun; 44(6):1412-3. PubMed ID: 3618623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Drug preparation techniques for i.v. drug delivery systems. Colangelo A Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Nov; 44(11):2550-3. PubMed ID: 3687993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of various infusion pump administration techniques and rates on tobramycin delivery. Cacek AT; Moore JE; Bishop TS Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Nov; 45(11):2381-3. PubMed ID: 3228098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A protocol for pediatric IV meds. Axton SE; Fugate T Am J Nurs; 1987 Jul; 87(7):943-5. PubMed ID: 3649176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Drug delivery by retrograde intravenous infusions. Implications for therapy. Nahata MC NITA; 1987; 10(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 3648516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Preserving i.v. power if fluids are restricted. Sumner J RN; 1988 Aug; 51(8):26-8. PubMed ID: 3413419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical implications of i.v. drug administration in infants and children. Jew RK; Gordin P; Lengetti E Crit Care Nurse; 1997 Aug; 17(4):62-70. PubMed ID: 9325774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study--manual versus computerized automated drug delivery systems. Senefeld P; Patterson A J Intraven Nurs; 1991; 14(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 1748912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Altered drug infusion rates during syringe-pump infusion. Leff RD; Holstad SG; Kubajak CA; Roberts RJ Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Sep; 43(9):2241-2. PubMed ID: 3766585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. I.v. drug delivery: new technologies for consideration. DeMonaco HJ J Intraven Nurs; 1988; 11(5):316-20. PubMed ID: 3193294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravenous drug administration to low birthweight infants. Giacoia GP Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1987 Jan; 26(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 3791835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are you using the right i.v. pump? (continuing education credit). Lorenz BL RN; 1990 May; 53(5):31-7. PubMed ID: 2362992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ad hoc versus standardized admixtures for continuous infusion drugs in neonatal intensive care: cognitive task analysis of safety at the bedside. Brannon TS AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():862. PubMed ID: 17238482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]