These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33184562)

  • 1. Performance of Four Consumer-grade Air Pollution Measurement Devices in Different Residences.
    Manibusan S; Mainelis G
    Aerosol Air Qual Res; 2020 Feb; 20(2):217-230. PubMed ID: 33184562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of real-time instruments and gravimetric method when measuring particulate matter in a residential building.
    Wang Z; Calderón L; Patton AP; Sorensen Allacci M; Senick J; Wener R; Andrews CJ; Mainelis G
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Nov; 66(11):1109-1120. PubMed ID: 27333205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of consumer monitors to measure particulate matter.
    Sousan S; Koehler K; Hallett L; Peters TM
    J Aerosol Sci; 2017 May; 107():123-133. PubMed ID: 28871212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles.
    Singer BC; Delp WW
    Indoor Air; 2018 Jul; 28(4):624-639. PubMed ID: 29683219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One Year Evaluation of Three Low-Cost PM
    Zamora ML; Rice J; Koehler K
    Atmos Environ (1994); 2020 Aug; 235():. PubMed ID: 32647492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in PM
    Kushwaha M; Sreekanth V; Upadhya AR; Agrawal P; Apte JS; Marshall JD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(9):610. PubMed ID: 35876898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory and field evaluation of real-time and near real-time PM
    Mehadi A; Moosmüller H; Campbell DE; Ham W; Schweizer D; Tarnay L; Hunter J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):158-179. PubMed ID: 31403397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of light scattering devices and impactors for particulate measurements in indoor, outdoor, and personal environments.
    Liu LJ; Slaughter JC; Larson TV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Jul; 36(13):2977-86. PubMed ID: 12144275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
    Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and evaluation of a portable PM
    Tryner J; Quinn C; Windom BC; Volckens J
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Aug; 21(8):1403-1415. PubMed ID: 31389929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Dynamic Three-Dimensional Air Pollution Exposure Model for Hong Kong.
    Barratt B; Lee M; Wong P; Tang R; Tsui TH; Cheng W; Yang Y; Lai PC; Tian L; Thach TQ; Allen R; Brauer M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2018 Feb; 2018(194):1-65. PubMed ID: 31883241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring.
    Liu X; Jayaratne R; Thai P; Kuhn T; Zing I; Christensen B; Lamont R; Dunbabin M; Zhu S; Gao J; Wainwright D; Neale D; Kan R; Kirkwood J; Morawska L
    Environ Res; 2020 Jun; 185():109438. PubMed ID: 32276167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of fine particle measurements from a direct-reading instrument and a gravimetric sampling method.
    Kim JY; Magari SR; Herrick RF; Smith TJ; Christiani DC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Nov; 1(11):707-15. PubMed ID: 15673091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wildfire Smoke Adjustment Factors for Low-Cost and Professional PM
    Delp WW; Singer BC
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 32630124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining sensor-based measurement and modeling of PM
    Cox J; Cho SH; Ryan P; Isiugo K; Ross J; Chillrud S; Zhu Z; Jandarov R; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2019; 53(7):817-829. PubMed ID: 34334878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of continuous particle monitors for personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures.
    Wallace LA; Wheeler AJ; Kearney J; Van Ryswyk K; You H; Kulka RH; Rasmussen PE; Brook JR; Xu X
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 20502493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors.
    Williams R; Suggs J; Rodes C; Lawless P; Zweidinger R; Kwok R; Creason J; Sheldon L
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 11051539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of PM
    Li Z; Che W; Frey HC; Lau AKH; Lin C
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Sep; 228():433-442. PubMed ID: 28558284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.