198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33186628)
1. The activity of methacrylate esters in skin sensitisation test methods II. A review of complementary and additional analyses.
Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Feb; 119():104821. PubMed ID: 33186628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The activity of methacrylate esters in skin sensitisation test methods: A review.
Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jun; 104():14-20. PubMed ID: 30826317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the skin sensitising potency of the lower alkyl methacrylate esters.
Kimber I; Pemberton MA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Oct; 70(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 24956587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds.
Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of dermal sensitization potential for industrial or agricultural chemicals with EpiSensA.
Mizumachi H; LeBaron MJ; Settivari RS; Miyazawa M; Marty MS; Sakaguchi H
J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):915-927. PubMed ID: 33124094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Butler M; Gamer A; Garrigue JL; Gerberick GF; Newsome C; Steiling W; Vohr HW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1799-809. PubMed ID: 14563405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behaviour of chemical respiratory allergens in novel predictive methods for skin sensitisation.
Basketter D; Poole A; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Jun; 86():101-106. PubMed ID: 28274809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting skin sensitisation using a decision tree integrated testing strategy with an in silico model and in chemico/in vitro assays.
Macmillan DS; Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Williams RV; Barber CG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():30-8. PubMed ID: 26796566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin sensitisation: the Colipa strategy for developing and evaluating non-animal test methods for risk assessment.
Maxwell G; Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Diembeck W; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Schroeder K; Tailhardat M; Teissier S; Winkler P
ALTEX; 2011; 28(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 21311850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin sensitisation testing--new perspectives and recommendations.
Steiling W; Basketter D; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Kimber I; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 11295477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is a combination of assays really needed for non-animal prediction of skin sensitization potential? Performance of the GARD™ (Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection) assay in comparison with OECD guideline assays alone and in combination.
Roberts DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Oct; 98():155-160. PubMed ID: 30048705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propylene glycol, skin sensitisation and allergic contact dermatitis: A scientific and regulatory conundrum.
Pemberton MA; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Feb; 138():105341. PubMed ID: 36702195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of peptide reactivity assays for skin sensitisation hazard identification and risk assessment.
Gerberick GF
Altern Lab Anim; 2016 Oct; 44(5):437-442. PubMed ID: 27805826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.
Hirota M; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Takenouchi O; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1333-47. PubMed ID: 25824844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the skin sensitisation hazard of functional polysiloxanes and silanes in the SENS-IS assay.
Petry T; Bosch A; Koraïchi-Emeriau F; Eigler D; Germain P; Seidel S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Oct; 98():209-214. PubMed ID: 30056248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applicability of an Integrated Testing Strategy consisting of in silico, in chemico and in vitro assays for evaluating the skin sensitization potencies of isocyanates.
Ohtake T; Maeda Y; Hayashi T; Yamanaka H; Nakai M; Takeyoshi M
Toxicology; 2018 Jan; 393():9-14. PubMed ID: 29100879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
