These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33186711)

  • 1. Speech frequency-following response in human auditory cortex is more than a simple tracking.
    Guo N; Si X; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Zhou W; Zhang D; Hong B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117545. PubMed ID: 33186711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings reveal vocal pitch elicited cortical gamma oscillations in young and older adults.
    Ross B; Tremblay KL; Alain C
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 204():116253. PubMed ID: 31600592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study.
    Gorina-Careta N; Kurkela JLO; Hämäläinen J; Astikainen P; Escera C
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117866. PubMed ID: 33592244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.
    Coffey EBJ; Musacchia G; Zatorre RJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.
    Kulasingham JP; Brodbeck C; Presacco A; Kuchinsky SE; Anderson S; Simon JZ
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():117291. PubMed ID: 32835821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional Modulation of the Cortical Contribution to the Frequency-Following Response Evoked by Continuous Speech.
    Schüller A; Schilling A; Krauss P; Rampp S; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 43(44):7429-7440. PubMed ID: 37793908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oscillatory Entrainment of the Frequency-following Response in Auditory Cortical and Subcortical Structures.
    Coffey EBJ; Arseneau-Bruneau I; Zhang X; Baillet S; Zatorre RJ
    J Neurosci; 2021 May; 41(18):4073-4087. PubMed ID: 33731448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human cortical dynamics determined by speech fundamental frequency.
    Mäkelä AM; Alku P; Mäkinen V; Valtonen J; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1300-5. PubMed ID: 12414269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prosodic pitch processing is represented in delta-band EEG and is dissociable from the cortical tracking of other acoustic and phonetic features.
    Teoh ES; Cappelloni MS; Lalor EC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 50(11):3831-3842. PubMed ID: 31287601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural representation of harmonic complex tones in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey.
    Fishman YI; Micheyl C; Steinschneider M
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(25):10312-23. PubMed ID: 23785145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones.
    Greenberg S; Marsh JT; Brown WS; Smith JC
    Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):91-114. PubMed ID: 3558136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlated brain stem and cortical evoked responses to auditory tone change.
    Galbraith GC; Gutterson RP; Levy DS; Mussey JL; Sabatasso FA; Wasserman RI
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(17):2613-6. PubMed ID: 15570162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.