137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33186830)
1. Uptake of minimally invasive surgery for early stage colorectal cancer and its effect on survival: A population-based study.
Akhtar-Danesh N; Logie K; Akhtar-Danesh GG; Finley C
Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():540-546. PubMed ID: 33186830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uptake and survival effects of minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer: A population-based study.
Akhtar-Danseh GG; Akhtar-Danesh N; Finley C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1791-1796. PubMed ID: 33468371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting the selection of minimally invasive surgery for stage 0/I colorectal cancer.
Kim DH; Kim IY; Kim BR; Kim YW
Int J Surg; 2015 Apr; 16(Pt A):44-48. PubMed ID: 25749437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of open and minimally invasive approaches to colon cancer resection in compliance with 12 regional lymph node harvest quality measure.
Williams AD; Sun T; Kakade S; Wong SL; Shulman LN; Carp NZ
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 123(4):986-996. PubMed ID: 33577718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disparities in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Kasi PM; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
Am J Surg; 2019 Aug; 218(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 30503514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obese patients benefit from minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
Balentine CJ; Marshall C; Robinson C; Wilks J; Anaya D; Albo D; Berger DH
J Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 163(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 20538294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applicability of minimally invasive surgery for clinically T4 colorectal cancer.
Liao YT; Liang JT
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20347. PubMed ID: 33230168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Initial follow-up.
Hoffman GC; Baker JW; Doxey JB; Hubbard GW; Ruffin WK; Wishner JA
Ann Surg; 1996 Jun; 223(6):790-6; discussion 796-8. PubMed ID: 8645052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-invasive
Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal metastases: A case-control study of 130 patients.
Karagkounis G; Akyuz M; Guerron AD; Yazici P; Aucejo FN; Quintini C; Miller CM; Vogt DP; Fung JJ; Berber E
Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 27486002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients.
Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Marshall CL; Wilks JA; Anaya D; Artinyan A; Berger DH; Albo D
J Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 166(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 21276980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer remains underutilized in Germany despite its nationwide application over the last decade.
Ghadban T; Reeh M; Bockhorn M; Heumann A; Grotelueschen R; Bachmann K; Izbicki JR; Perez DR
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15146. PubMed ID: 30310116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
