Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33186830)

  • 1. Uptake of minimally invasive surgery for early stage colorectal cancer and its effect on survival: A population-based study.
    Akhtar-Danesh N; Logie K; Akhtar-Danesh GG; Finley C
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():540-546. PubMed ID: 33186830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uptake and survival effects of minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer: A population-based study.
    Akhtar-Danseh GG; Akhtar-Danesh N; Finley C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1791-1796. PubMed ID: 33468371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the selection of minimally invasive surgery for stage 0/I colorectal cancer.
    Kim DH; Kim IY; Kim BR; Kim YW
    Int J Surg; 2015 Apr; 16(Pt A):44-48. PubMed ID: 25749437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of open and minimally invasive approaches to colon cancer resection in compliance with 12 regional lymph node harvest quality measure.
    Williams AD; Sun T; Kakade S; Wong SL; Shulman LN; Carp NZ
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 123(4):986-996. PubMed ID: 33577718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disparities in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Florida.
    Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Kasi PM; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
    Am J Surg; 2019 Aug; 218(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 30503514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Obese patients benefit from minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
    Balentine CJ; Marshall C; Robinson C; Wilks J; Anaya D; Albo D; Berger DH
    J Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 163(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 20538294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
    Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability of minimally invasive surgery for clinically T4 colorectal cancer.
    Liao YT; Liang JT
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20347. PubMed ID: 33230168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Initial follow-up.
    Hoffman GC; Baker JW; Doxey JB; Hubbard GW; Ruffin WK; Wishner JA
    Ann Surg; 1996 Jun; 223(6):790-6; discussion 796-8. PubMed ID: 8645052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini-invasive
    Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal metastases: A case-control study of 130 patients.
    Karagkounis G; Akyuz M; Guerron AD; Yazici P; Aucejo FN; Quintini C; Miller CM; Vogt DP; Fung JJ; Berber E
    Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 27486002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
    Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
    Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients.
    Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Marshall CL; Wilks JA; Anaya D; Artinyan A; Berger DH; Albo D
    J Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 166(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 21276980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
    Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer remains underutilized in Germany despite its nationwide application over the last decade.
    Ghadban T; Reeh M; Bockhorn M; Heumann A; Grotelueschen R; Bachmann K; Izbicki JR; Perez DR
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15146. PubMed ID: 30310116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
    Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.