These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33188644)

  • 21. Environmental RNA outperforms eDNA metabarcoding in assessing impact of marine pollution: A chromium-spiked mesocosm test.
    Greco M; Lejzerowicz F; Reo E; Caruso A; Maccotta A; Coccioni R; Pawlowski J; Frontalini F
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 298():134239. PubMed ID: 35292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of soil preservation for biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA.
    Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Münkemüller T; Gielly L; Thuiller W; Francesco Ficetola G
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3313-3325. PubMed ID: 33034070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
    Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas.
    Gold Z; Sprague J; Kushner DJ; Zerecero Marin E; Barber PH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0238557. PubMed ID: 33626067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis.
    Bessey C; Neil Jarman S; Simpson T; Miller H; Stewart T; Kenneth Keesing J; Berry O
    Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):236. PubMed ID: 33619330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. eDNA metabarcoding survey reveals fine-scale coral reef community variation across a remote, tropical island ecosystem.
    West KM; Stat M; Harvey ES; Skepper CL; DiBattista JD; Richards ZT; Travers MJ; Newman SJ; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Mar; 29(6):1069-1086. PubMed ID: 32045076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water.
    Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
    Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Environmental DNA gives comparable results to morphology-based indices of macroinvertebrates in a large-scale ecological assessment.
    Brantschen J; Blackman RC; Walser JC; Altermatt F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257510. PubMed ID: 34547039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The future of fish-based ecological assessment of European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches.
    Pont D; Valentini A; Rocle M; Maire A; Delaigue O; Jean P; Dejean T
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):354-366. PubMed ID: 31644817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mapping biodiversity hotspots of fish communities in subtropical streams through environmental DNA.
    Blackman RC; Osathanunkul M; Brantschen J; Di Muri C; Harper LR; Mächler E; Hänfling B; Altermatt F
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10375. PubMed ID: 33990677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Steps forward in biomonitoring 2.0: eDNA Metabarcoding and community-level modelling allow the assessment of complex drivers of Neotropical fish diversity.
    Carvalho DC; Leal CG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Apr; 29(7):1688-1690. PubMed ID: 36635221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multispecies models reveal that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than backpack electrofishing for conducting fish surveys in freshwater streams.
    McColl-Gausden EF; Weeks AR; Coleman RA; Robinson KL; Song S; Raadik TA; Tingley R
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3111-3126. PubMed ID: 32966639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
    Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-throughput environmental DNA analysis informs a biological assessment of an urban stream.
    Bagley M; Pilgrim E; Knapp M; Yoder C; Domingo JS; Banerji A
    Ecol Indic; 2019; 104():378-389. PubMed ID: 31275063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes.
    Cilleros K; Valentini A; Allard L; Dejean T; Etienne R; Grenouillet G; Iribar A; Taberlet P; Vigouroux R; Brosse S
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 29768738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
    Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lost and found: Frogs in a biodiversity hotspot rediscovered with environmental DNA.
    Lopes CM; Baêta D; Valentini A; Lyra ML; Sabbag AF; Gasparini JL; Dejean T; Haddad CFB; Zamudio KR
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3289-3298. PubMed ID: 32786119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aquatic environmental DNA: A review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution.
    Takahashi M; Saccò M; Kestel JH; Nester G; Campbell MA; van der Heyde M; Heydenrych MJ; Juszkiewicz DJ; Nevill P; Dawkins KL; Bessey C; Fernandes K; Miller H; Power M; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Newton JP; White NE; Richards ZT; Allentoft ME
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 873():162322. PubMed ID: 36801404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.