136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33189496)
1. Predictive Factors for Revision and Survivorship Analysis of a Prevalent 36-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement System: A Large Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Pearce O; Matharu GS; Bolland BJ
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Apr; 36(4):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 33189496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.
Matharu GS; Nandra RS; Berryman F; Judge A; Pynsent PB; Dunlop DJ
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 28455467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Declining Revision Burden of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties.
Lainiala OS; Reito AP; Nieminen JJ; Eskelinen AP
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2058-2064.e1. PubMed ID: 31174908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Hunt LP; Murray DW; Howard P; Pandit HG; Blom AW; Bolland B; Judge A
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 29305448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 28768778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of time to revision and clinical outcomes following revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements for adverse reaction to metal debris.
Matharu GS; Pynsent PB; Sumathi VP; Mittal S; Buckley CD; Dunlop DJ; Revell PA; Revell MP
Bone Joint J; 2014 Dec; 96-B(12):1600-9. PubMed ID: 25452361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.
Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):617-26. PubMed ID: 27098320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survivorship of a Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Implant With Modular Titanium Adapter.
Semaan DJ; Rutledge-Jukes H; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Adams JB; Crawford DA
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S560-S565. PubMed ID: 35219576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Rymaszewska M; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jun; 95-B(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 23723267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions.
Matharu GS; Berryman F; Dunlop DJ; Revell MP; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1483-1491. PubMed ID: 30992241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Sneller MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):509-20. PubMed ID: 25367107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blood Metal Ion Thresholds to Identify Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: An External Multicenter Validation Study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Implants.
Matharu GS; Berryman F; Judge A; Reito A; McConnell J; Lainiala O; Young S; Eskelinen A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1532-1539. PubMed ID: 28926382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications and re-revisions after revisions of 528 metal-on-metal hips because of adverse reaction to metal debris.
Lainiala O; Reito A; Nieminen J; Eskelinen A
Acta Orthop; 2020 Aug; 91(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 32285741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
