303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33190756)
1. Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.
Rosenthal Y; Rettig SA; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2564-2570. PubMed ID: 33190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer navigation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical trial to evaluate the learning curve.
Wang AW; Hayes A; Gibbons R; Mackie KE
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Mar; 29(3):617-623. PubMed ID: 31648783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.
Schoch BS; Haupt E; Leonor T; Farmer KW; Wright TW; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2257-2263. PubMed ID: 32586595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High intraoperative accuracy and low complication rate of computer-assisted navigation of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Larose G; Greene AT; Jung A; Polakovic SV; Davis NZ; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jun; 32(6S):S39-S45. PubMed ID: 36681107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study.
Nashikkar PS; Scholes CJ; Haber MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Dec; 28(12):e398-e409. PubMed ID: 31353300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hsu CP; Wu CT; Chen CY; Lin SC; Hsu KY
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jul; 143(7):4065-4075. PubMed ID: 36445496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emerging Technologies in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Navigation, Mixed Reality, and Preoperative Planning.
Jennewine BR; Brolin TJ
Orthop Clin North Am; 2023 Apr; 54(2):209-225. PubMed ID: 36894293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Preoperative Implant Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Hamilton MA; Polakovic S; Saadi P; Jones RB; Parsons IM; Cheung EV
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 26631196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific planning in shoulder arthroplasty.
Min KS; Fox HM; Bedi A; Walch G; Warner JJP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Mar; 102-B(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 32114820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Value of Computer-Assisted Navigation for Glenoid Baseplate Implantation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Velasquez Garcia A; Abdo G; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Morrey ME
JBJS Rev; 2023 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 37616447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time intraoperative 3D image intensifier-based navigation in reversed shoulder arthroplasty- analyses of image quality.
Theopold J; Pieroh P; Henkelmann R; Osterhoff G; Hepp P
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):262. PubMed ID: 31142297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Lima DJL; Markel J; Yawman JP; Whaley JD; Sabesan VJ
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 30949924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Iannotti JP; Walker K; Rodriguez E; Patterson TE; Jun BJ; Ricchetti ET
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(5):446-457. PubMed ID: 30845039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Porous metal wedge augments to address glenoid retroversion in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: midterm update.
Sandow MJ; Tu CG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1821-1830. PubMed ID: 32305149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of glenoid wear pattern on glenoid component placement accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty.
Hao KA; Sutton CD; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Wright JO; Struk AM; Haupt ET; Leonor T; King JJ
JSES Int; 2022 Mar; 6(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 35252914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shoulder patient-specific guide: First experience in 10 patients indicates room for improvement.
Berhouet J; Rol M; Spiry C; Slimane M; Chevalier C; Favard L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Feb; 104(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29246481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
