BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33191451)

  • 1. Institutional arthroplasty registry: what is the minimum acceptable dataset to be included in your hospital? Recommendations from a single-country national consensus using the Delphi method.
    Bonilla GA; Montoya BE; Restrepo VE; Gomez MM; Sánchez AA; Sánchez JI; Rodríguez HA; Rincón JA; Solano AL; Cardona D; Martínez SL; López A; Moore JL;
    Int Orthop; 2021 Jan; 45(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 33191451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between the American Society Of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of theNew Zealand Joint Registry.
    Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Hooper NM; Frampton C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):1065-70. PubMed ID: 22717825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Influence of institutional experience on results in hip and knee total arthroplasty : An analysis from the German arthroplasty registry (EPRD)].
    Steinbrück A; Grimberg A; Melsheimer O; Jansson V
    Orthopade; 2020 Sep; 49(9):808-814. PubMed ID: 32885289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results.
    Bautista MP; Bonilla GA; Mieth KW; Llinás AM; Rodríguez F; Cárdenas LL;
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2065-2069. PubMed ID: 28302461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry: A Comparison With Other National Registries.
    Heckmann N; Ihn H; Stefl M; Etkin CD; Springer BD; Berry DJ; Lieberman JR
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S125-S134.e1. PubMed ID: 30711371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and early findings of a semiautomated arthroplasty registry in a multi-institutional healthcare network.
    Florissi I; Galea VP; Sauder N; Colon Iban Y; Heng M; Ahmed FK; Malchau H; Bragdon CR
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jul; 102-B(7_Supple_B):90-98. PubMed ID: 32600193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can Bar Code Scanning Improve Data Capture in a National Register? Findings from the Irish National Orthopaedic Register.
    Russell SP; Broderick JM; O'Dea SD; Fahey E; Kenny P; Cashman J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1971-1976. PubMed ID: 35857333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry.
    Afzal I; Radha S; Smoljanović T; Stafford GH; Twyman R; Field RE
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Oct; 14(1):318. PubMed ID: 31601231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The progression of end-stage osteoarthritis: analysis of data from the Australian and Norwegian joint replacement registries using a multi-state model.
    Gillam MH; Lie SA; Salter A; Furnes O; Graves SE; Havelin LI; Ryan P
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Mar; 21(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 23274101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arthroplasty implant registries over the past five decades: Development, current, and future impact.
    Malchau H; Garellick G; Berry D; Harris WH; Robertson O; Kärrlholm J; Lewallen D; Bragdon CR; Lidgren L; Herberts P
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Sep; 36(9):2319-2330. PubMed ID: 29663575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimising perioperative care for hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa: a Delphi consensus study.
    Plenge U; Nortje MB; Marais LC; Jordaan JD; Parker R; van der Westhuizen N; van der Merwe JF; Marais J; September WV; Davies GL; Pretorius T; Solomon C; Ryan P; Torborg AM; Farina Z; Smit R; Cairns C; Shanahan H; Sombili S; Mazibuko A; Hobbs HR; Porrill OS; Timothy NE; Siebritz RE; van der Westhuizen C; Troskie AJ; Blake CA; Gray LA; Munting TW; Steinhaus HKS; Rowe P; van der Walt JG; Isaacs Noordien R; Theron A; Biccard BM
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 May; 19(1):140. PubMed ID: 29743063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [How to select a prosthesis for a primary hip replacement? Minimum acceptable survival: results of a consensus of experts].
    Bautista M; Muskus M; Bonilla G; Mieth K; Gutiérrez C; Llinás A
    Acta Ortop Mex; 2017; 31(6):292-299. PubMed ID: 29641856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.
    Rolfson O; Bohm E; Franklin P; Lyman S; Denissen G; Dawson J; Dunn J; Eresian Chenok K; Dunbar M; Overgaard S; Garellick G; Lübbeke A;
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Jul; 87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. PubMed ID: 27228230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after elective hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty: protocol for a prospective cohort study.
    Grassi A; Golinelli D; Tedesco D; Rolli M; Bordini B; Amabile M; Rucci P; Fantini MP; Zaffagnini S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Aug; 20(1):374. PubMed ID: 31416443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): protocol for an evaluation of the requirements for arthroplasty follow-up, and the production of consensus-based recommendations.
    Czoski Murray CJ; Kingsbury SR; Arden NK; Hewison J; Judge A; Matu J; O'Shea J; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Smith LK; Smith C; Thomas CM; West RM; Wright JM; Conaghan PG; Stone MH
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e031351. PubMed ID: 31243039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a hospital-based joint registry: quantification of errors and maximizing utility.
    Barr CJ; Barbalace RJ; Wessinger SJ; Bragdon CR; Kwon YM; Malchau H
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Dec; 27(10):1766-71. PubMed ID: 22743121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining Treatment Success After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
    Tan TL; Goswami K; Fillingham YA; Shohat N; Rondon AJ; Parvizi J
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Nov; 33(11):3541-3546. PubMed ID: 30100137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are Histological Examinations of Arthroplasty Specimens Performed Consistently Across the Country? A Large Database Study.
    Suchman KI; Poeran J; Huang HH; Mazumdar M; Bronson M; Galatz LM; Moucha CS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 477(8):1815-1824. PubMed ID: 30801277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Validity of All-Cause 30-Day Readmission Rate as a Hospital Performance Metric After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Ali AM; Bottle A
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1831-1836. PubMed ID: 31072744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [SECOT consensus on thromboembolisms in knee and hip replacement surgery].
    Castellet E; Peidró L; Otero R
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2013; 57(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23608217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.