These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation. Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test. Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors that increase reactivity during fetal nonstress testing. Esin S Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24614020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the auscultated acceleration test and the nonstress test as predictors of perinatal outcomes. Paine LL; Benedict MI; Strobino DM; Gegor CL; Larson EL Nurs Res; 1992; 41(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 1549525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine use of antenatal nonstress tests in pregnant women with diabetes-What is the practice? Jørgensen IL; Vestgaard M; Ásbjörnsdóttir B; Mathiesen ER; Damm P Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 May; 248():89-94. PubMed ID: 32199298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic values of concurrent nonstress testing, amniotic fluid measurement, and Doppler velocimetry in screening a general high-risk population. Devoe LD; Gardner P; Dear C; Castillo RA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):1040-7; discussion 1047-8. PubMed ID: 2206056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations. An alternative to the nonstress test. Daniels SM; Boehm N J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 2037878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The nonstress test: the false negative test. Phelan JP; Cromartie AD; Smith CV Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 142(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 7065018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The role of vibroacoustic stimulation in antenatal fetal assessment]. Leis Marquez MT; Hernández Andrade E; Maya Goldsmit D; Pérez de la Huerta MI; López García RB Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1993 Dec; 61():356-9. PubMed ID: 8119607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biophysical profile for antepartum fetal assessment. Norman LA; Karp LE Am Fam Physician; 1986 Oct; 34(4):83-9. PubMed ID: 3532741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. Miller DA; Rabello YA; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 174(3):812-7. PubMed ID: 8633648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies. Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The predictive value of a nonstress test taken 24 h before delivery in high-risk pregnancies. Salamalekis E; Vitoratos N; Loghis C; Mortakis A; Zourlas PA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1994 May; 45(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 7915677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]