132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3319374)
1. Comparison of RapID-ANA and Minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobes.
Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Kelly T; Groves D
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 May; 7(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3319374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
Burlage RS; Ellner PD
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3894412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
Downes J; Andrew JH
Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3060822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
Bergan T; Vangdal M; Salveson A
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample preparation method influences direct identification of anaerobic bacteria from positive blood culture bottles using MALDI-TOF MS.
Jeverica S; Nagy E; Mueller-Premru M; Papst L
Anaerobe; 2018 Dec; 54():231-235. PubMed ID: 29861277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of the RapID-ANA II panel for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
Celig DM; Schreckenberger PC
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 2037661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin.
Adney WS; Jones RL
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):980-3. PubMed ID: 3905854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Presumpto Plates to identify anaerobic bacteria.
Whaley DN; Wiggs LS; Miller PH; Srivastava PU; Miller JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1196-202. PubMed ID: 7615728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptation of a coculture technique to the Minitek anaerobe system.
Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Bürger H; Groves D
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):645-6. PubMed ID: 3886697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specimen collection and transport, anaerobic culture techniques, and identification of anaerobes.
Citron DM
Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S51-8. PubMed ID: 6372037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.
Hanson CW; Cassorla R; Martin WJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Jul; 10(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 387809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.
Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 2056052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Minitek Anaerobe II, API An-Ident, and RapID ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
Bate G
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jun; 85(6):716-8. PubMed ID: 3518405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current issues and problems in dealing with anaerobes in the clinical laboratory.
Allen SD; Siders JA; Marler LM
Clin Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 15(2):333-64. PubMed ID: 7671577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
Summanen P; Jousimies-Somer H
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Dec; 7(6):771-5. PubMed ID: 3145860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vitek 2 ANC card versus BBL Crystal Anaerobe and RapID ANA II for identification of clinical anaerobic bacteria.
Blairon L; Maza ML; Wybo I; Piérard D; Dediste A; Vandenberg O
Anaerobe; 2010 Aug; 16(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 20685292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Minitek system with conventional methods for identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative gram-negative bacilli.
Wellstood-Nuesse S
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Apr; 9(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 379041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.
Stargel D; Thompson FS; Phillips SE; Lombard GL; Dowell VR
J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Mar; 3(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 773959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
