206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33194417)
1. Comparing sediment DNA extraction methods for assessing organic enrichment associated with marine aquaculture.
Pearman JK; Keeley NB; Wood SA; Laroche O; Zaiko A; Thomson-Laing G; Biessy L; Atalah J; Pochon X
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10231. PubMed ID: 33194417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effects of DNA Extraction Kits and Primers on Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Microbial Community in Freshwater Sediments.
Shi Z; Kong Q; Li X; Xu W; Mao C; Wang Y; Song W; Huang J
Microorganisms; 2022 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 35744736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of foraminifera communities to aquaculture-derived organic enrichment as revealed by environmental DNA metabarcoding.
He X; Sutherland TF; Pawlowski J; Abbott CL
Mol Ecol; 2019 Mar; 28(5):1138-1153. PubMed ID: 30614581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.
Mahmoudi N; Slater GF; Fulthorpe RR
Can J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 57(8):623-8. PubMed ID: 21815819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing quantile regression spline analyses and supervised machine learning for environmental quality assessment at coastal marine aquaculture installations.
Leontidou K; Rubel V; Stoeck T
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15425. PubMed ID: 37334127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of DNA extraction kits on freshwater fungal DNA metabarcoding.
Matsuoka S; Sugiyama Y; Nagano M; Doi H
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13477. PubMed ID: 35651749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling.
Bollmann-Giolai A; Giolai M; Heavens D; Macaulay I; Malone J; Clark MD
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e1133. PubMed ID: 33225533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Simple, Cost-Effective, and Automation-Friendly Direct PCR Approach for Bacterial Community Analysis.
Song F; Kuehl JV; Chandran A; Arkin AP
mSystems; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0022421. PubMed ID: 34581599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate assessment of the impact of salmon farming on benthic sediment enrichment using foraminiferal metabarcoding.
Pochon X; Wood SA; Keeley NB; Lejzerowicz F; Esling P; Drew J; Pawlowski J
Mar Pollut Bull; 2015 Nov; 100(1):370-382. PubMed ID: 26337228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Two Common DNA Extraction Kits for the Characterization of Symbiotic Microbial Communities from Ascidian Tissue.
Evans JS; López-Legentil S; Erwin PM
Microbes Environ; 2018 Dec; 33(4):435-439. PubMed ID: 30487350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grab what you can-an evaluation of spatial replication to decrease heterogeneity in sediment eDNA metabarcoding.
Hestetun JT; Lanzén A; Dahlgren TG
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11619. PubMed ID: 34221724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples.
Seethalakshmi PS; Kumaresan TN; Vishnu Prasad Nair RU; Prathiviraj R; Seghal Kiran G; Selvin J
Arch Microbiol; 2024 Jun; 206(7):314. PubMed ID: 38900289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biotic signals associated with benthic impacts of salmon farms from eDNA metabarcoding of sediments.
He X; Gilmore SR; Sutherland TF; Hajibabaei M; Miller KM; Westfall KM; Pawlowski J; Abbott CL
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3158-3174. PubMed ID: 33481325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metabarcoding monitoring analysis: the pros and cons of using co-extracted environmental DNA and RNA data to assess offshore oil production impacts on benthic communities.
Laroche O; Wood SA; Tremblay LA; Lear G; Ellis JI; Pochon X
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3347. PubMed ID: 28533985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Kennedy NA; Walker AW; Berry SH; Duncan SH; Farquarson FM; Louis P; Thomson JM; ; Satsangi J; Flint HJ; Parkhill J; Lees CW; Hold GL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88982. PubMed ID: 24586470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Species-level biodiversity assessment using marine environmental DNA metabarcoding requires protocol optimization and standardization.
Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Taylor HR; Lamare MD; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
Ecol Evol; 2019 Feb; 9(3):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 30805162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using eRNA/eDNA metabarcoding to detect community-level impacts of nanoplastic exposure to benthic estuarine ecosystems.
Giroux MS; Reichman JR; Langknecht T; Burgess RM; Ho KT
Environ Pollut; 2023 Dec; 338():122650. PubMed ID: 37777055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes.
Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
