220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33194609)
1. A Comparison Study of Machine Learning (Random Survival Forest) and Classic Statistic (Cox Proportional Hazards) for Predicting Progression in High-Grade Glioma after Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.
Qiu X; Gao J; Yang J; Hu J; Hu W; Kong L; Lu JJ
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():551420. PubMed ID: 33194609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A machine learning-based survival prediction model of high grade glioma by integration of clinical and dose-volume histogram parameters.
Chen H; Li C; Zheng L; Lu W; Li Y; Wei Q
Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(8):2774-2786. PubMed ID: 33760360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perfusion MR prior to radiotherapy is a strong predictor of survival in high-grade gliomas after proton and carbon ion radiotherapy.
Qiu X; Gao J; Yang J; Hu J; Hu W; Zhang X; Lu JJ; Kong L
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Nov; 10(22):1199. PubMed ID: 36544672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Xiao J; Mo M; Wang Z; Zhou C; Shen J; Yuan J; He Y; Zheng Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e33440. PubMed ID: 35179504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognosis prediction of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcomas treated with surgical resection with radiomic analysis based on random survival forest.
Yang Y; Ma X; Wang Y; Ding X
Updates Surg; 2022 Feb; 74(1):355-365. PubMed ID: 34003477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Yang X; Qiu H; Wang L; Wang X
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44417. PubMed ID: 37883174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Progression-Free Survival Prediction in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: Machine Learning vs. Traditional Statistics.
Oei RW; Lyu Y; Ye L; Kong F; Du C; Zhai R; Xu T; Shen C; He X; Kong L; Hu C; Ying H
J Pers Med; 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34442430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognosis prediction for glioblastoma multiforme patients using machine learning approaches: Development of the clinically applicable model.
Kim Y; Kim KH; Park J; Yoon HI; Sung W
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109617. PubMed ID: 36921767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality for acute coronary syndrome
Hadanny A; Shouval R; Wu J; Gale CP; Unger R; Zahger D; Gottlieb S; Matetzky S; Goldenberg I; Beigel R; Iakobishvili Z
J Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 79(3):342-351. PubMed ID: 34857429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application value of machine learning algorithms for predicting recurrence after resection of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma].
Ji GW; Wang K; Xia YX; Li XC; Wang XH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 59(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 34192861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Explainable deep learning-based survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy.
Astley JR; Reilly JM; Robinson S; Wild JM; Hatton MQ; Tahir BA
Radiother Oncol; 2024 Apr; 193():110084. PubMed ID: 38244779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Particle radiation therapy in the management of malignant glioma: Early experience at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center.
Kong L; Wu J; Gao J; Qiu X; Yang J; Hu J; Hu W; Mao Y; Lu JJ
Cancer; 2020 Jun; 126(12):2802-2810. PubMed ID: 32167589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized postoperative chemotherapy: A real-world study of distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Wang D; Pan B; Huang JC; Chen Q; Cui SP; Lang R; Lyu SC
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1106029. PubMed ID: 37007095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a machine learning model to predict early recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection.
Zeng J; Zeng J; Lin K; Lin H; Wu Q; Guo P; Zhou W; Liu J
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr; 2022 Apr; 11(2):176-187. PubMed ID: 35464276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretable machine learning for predicting chronic kidney disease progression risk.
Zheng JX; Li X; Zhu J; Guan SY; Zhang SX; Wang WM
Digit Health; 2024; 10():20552076231224225. PubMed ID: 38235416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: variable selection and predictive performance.
Liu Y; Zhou S; Wei H; An S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 34563138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep learning models for predicting the survival of patients with chondrosarcoma based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.
Yan L; Gao N; Ai F; Zhao Y; Kang Y; Chen J; Weng Y
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():967758. PubMed ID: 36072795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of time-to-event machine learning models in predicting oral cavity cancer prognosis.
Adeoye J; Hui L; Koohi-Moghadam M; Tan JY; Choi SW; Thomson P
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Jan; 157():104635. PubMed ID: 34800847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
