These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33196872)

  • 1. Three-dimensional visualization system is one of the factors that improve short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Kudo T; Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):631-639. PubMed ID: 33196872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is associated with pneumonia in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Feb; 35(2):837-844. PubMed ID: 32086619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in Prone Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Oshikiri T; Goto H; Horikawa M; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Kakeji Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7249-7257. PubMed ID: 34032960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement Effect of Upper Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy on the Prognosis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Efficacy Index and Propensity Score Matching Analyses.
    Oshikiri T; Goto H; Kato T; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Matsuda T; Kakeji Y
    J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Nov; 237(5):762-770. PubMed ID: 37366544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
    Takahashi M; Toyama H; Takahashi K; Kaiho Y; Ejima Y; Yamauchi M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 38238681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
    Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel "Modified Bascule Method" for Lymphadenectomy Along the Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):4918-4927. PubMed ID: 33686596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of pleural adhesions on short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Zhao XL; Liu B; Li KK; Wang YJ; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):1727-1734. PubMed ID: 36214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Chao YK; Hsieh MJ; Liu YH; Liu HP
    World J Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(2):590-598. PubMed ID: 28801820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.