140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33197272)
1. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Going Beyond Conventional Mammographic Density to Discover Novel Mammogram-Based Predictors of Breast Cancer Risk.
Hopper JL; Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Song YM; Sung J; Dite GS; Dowty JG; Li S
J Clin Med; 2020 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32110975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study.
Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Apicella C; Stone J; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 27316945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of breast cancer with quantitative mammographic density measures for women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography.
Watt GP; Keshavamurthy KN; Nguyen TL; Lobbes MBI; Jochelson MS; Sung JS; Moskowitz CS; Patel P; Liang X; Woods M; Hopper JL; Pike MC; Bernstein JL
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2024 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38565262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk.
Heine JJ; Scott CG; Sellers TA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Schueler BA; Couch FJ; Olson JE; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jul; 104(13):1028-37. PubMed ID: 22761274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cirrus: An Automated Mammography-Based Measure of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Textural Features.
Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Goudey B; Dite GS; Stone J; Nguyen TL; Dowty JG; Baglietto L; Southey MC; Maskarinec G; Giles GG; Hopper JL
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2018 Oct; 2(4):pky057. PubMed ID: 31360877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Causal relationships between breast cancer risk factors based on mammographic features.
Ye Z; Nguyen TL; Dite GS; MacInnis RJ; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Al-Qershi OM; Bui M; Esser VFC; Dowty JG; Trinh HN; Evans CF; Tan M; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Giles GG; Southey MC; Hopper JL; Li S
Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Oct; 25(1):127. PubMed ID: 37880807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31228956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of contralateral breast cancer risk with mammographic density defined at higher-than-conventional intensity thresholds.
Watt GP; Knight JA; Nguyen TL; Reiner AS; Malone KE; John EM; Lynch CF; Brooks JD; Woods M; Liang X; Bernstein L; Pike MC; Hopper JL; Bernstein JL
Int J Cancer; 2022 Oct; 151(8):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 35315524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study.
Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; McLean C; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):859. PubMed ID: 29246131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
