BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33198286)

  • 1. The Paradox of Group Citizenship and Constructive Deviance: A Resolution of Environmental Dynamism and Moral Justification.
    Liu T; Chen Y; Hu C; Yuan X; Liu CE; He W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33198286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cross-level study of the relationship between ethical leadership and employee constructive deviance: Effects of moral self-efficacy and psychological safety climate.
    Shang L; Yang L
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():964787. PubMed ID: 36186324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance.
    Zhang Z; Shi H; Feng T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36430002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Lubricant" or "Stumbling Block"?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance.
    Xu J; Li YZ; Zhu DQ; Li JZ
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():835970. PubMed ID: 35432087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance.
    Loi TI; Kuhn KM; Sahaym A; Butterfield KD; Tripp TM
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Sep; 105(9):944-958. PubMed ID: 31904249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Paternalistic Leadership Style on Innovation Performance Based on the Research Perspective of the Mediating Effect of the Constructive Deviance of Employees.
    Li L; Wang S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():719281. PubMed ID: 34721169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Ambivalence Influence Employees' Constructive Deviance?
    Liu Z; Liu Q
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2024 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38275353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. For whom is patriotism blind? Examining the roles of moral intuitions and system justification.
    Iceland J; Silver E; Goff K
    Soc Sci Res; 2023 May; 112():102811. PubMed ID: 37061324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The double-edged sword effect of ethical leadership on constructive deviance: An integrated model of two approaches based on organizational identification and normative conflict.
    Niu L; Xia W; Liu Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():892395. PubMed ID: 35928427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Narcissistic Enough to Challenge: The Effect of Narcissism on Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
    Lang Y; Zhang H; Liu J; Zhang X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():792818. PubMed ID: 35222155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional Regulation Self-Efficacy Influences Moral Decision Making: A Non-Cooperative Game Study of the New Generation of Employees.
    Liu B; Yang T; Xie W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36498436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-Level Influence of Empowering Leadership on Constructive Deviance: The Different Roles of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Traditionality.
    Wang Y
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():810107. PubMed ID: 35185705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abusive supervision, leader-member exchange, and moral disengagement: A moderated-mediation model of organizational deviance.
    Valle M; Kacmar KM; Zivnuska S; Harting T
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(3):299-312. PubMed ID: 29676676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moral licensing, instrumental apology and insincerity aversion: Taking Immanuel Kant to the lab.
    Khalil EL; Feltovich N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206878. PubMed ID: 30408078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Its Outcomes: Two Mediation Models.
    Liang HL; Yeh TK; Wang CH
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():766952. PubMed ID: 35185718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moral Credentials, Intergroup Attitudes, and Regulatory Focus Interactively Affect Support for Affirmative Action.
    Lalot F; Falomir-Pichastor JM
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E49. PubMed ID: 31787120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: a study of antecedents and outcomes.
    Detert JR; TreviƱo LK; Sweitzer VL
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):374-91. PubMed ID: 18361639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of idealism and relativism on the moral judgement of social vs. environmental issues, and their relation to self-reported pro-environmental behaviours.
    Zaikauskaite L; Chen X; Tsivrikos D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239707. PubMed ID: 33104691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explaining Moral Behavior.
    Osman M; Wiegmann A
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 64(2):68-81. PubMed ID: 28497724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From Citizenship Pressure to Pro-Group Unethical Behavior: The Dual-Stage Moderating Role of Self-Serving Political Will.
    Zhang H; Hu M; Liu X; Yu X; Xie J
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37503991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.