BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33198740)

  • 1. Navigating the qualitative manuscript writing process: some tips for authors and reviewers.
    Roberts C; Kumar K; Finn G
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):439. PubMed ID: 33198740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tips for manuscript reviewers.
    Davidhizar R; Bechtel GA
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12841086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer.
    Kotsis SV; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):958-964. PubMed ID: 24675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The expression "proof" is often misused by reviewers and authors.
    Versprille A
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Jan; 23(1):131-2. PubMed ID: 9037659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
    Flanagin A
    Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [From a manuscript to an article in Tidsskriftet].
    Ringnes A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 16397648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript.
    Valente S
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16189960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Online submission of manuscripts for "The Orthopedist."].
    Orthopade; 2012 Oct; 41(10):799. PubMed ID: 23052845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals.
    Bordeaux BC; Wiley C; Tandon SD; Horowitz CR; Brown PB; Bass EB
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2007; 1(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 20208291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The need for the persons involved as reviewers in the peer-review system to disclose potential conflicts of interest regarding the manuscript or the authors.
    Murphy EJ
    Lipids; 2008 Feb; 43(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 18236093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejection: giving it and taking it.
    Taylor D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 'Seven deadly sins' of rejected papers.
    Kool B; Ziersch A; Robinson P; Wolfenden L; Lowe JB
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 40(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 26833892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers.
    Dewey M; Levine D; Bossuyt PM; Kressel HY
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):3986-3995. PubMed ID: 30694365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What to Do When Your Paper Is Rejected.
    Sullivan GM
    J Grad Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 26217410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Writing for publication--research manuscripts.
    Rosati RJ
    J Healthc Qual; 2008; 30(4):2, 47. PubMed ID: 18680918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Getting published in peer-reviewed journals.
    Dimitroulis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1342-5. PubMed ID: 22142552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Poor title--poor manuscript?
    Gjersvik P; Gulbrandsen P; Aasheim ET; Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Dec; 133(23-24):2475-7. PubMed ID: 24326496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publishing your findings.
    King KM; Price PM
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 12802838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How well does a journal's peer review process function? A survey of authors' opinions.
    Sweitzer BJ; Cullen DJ
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 8015130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.