214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33198991)
1. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design.
Ueda K; Watanabe F; Katsuta Y; Seto M; Ueno D; Hiroyasu K; Suzuki S; Erdelt K; Güth JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 33198991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses: Effects of prosthesis design, cement space, and zirconia type.
Suzuki S; Katsuta Y; Ueda K; Watanabe F
J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):460-467. PubMed ID: 32276830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: accuracy of fit.
Sachs C; Groesser J; Stadelmann M; Schweiger J; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2014 Aug; 30(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 24933230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
Su TS; Sun J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit.
Benic GI; Sailer I; Zeltner M; Gütermann JN; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 30396708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal Fit and Internal Adaptation of Monolithic Zirconia 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis: In Vitro Study.
Alkaff NA; Ruse DN; Aminzadeh K; Hannam AG; Mostafa N
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):109. PubMed ID: 38381993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.
Ueda K; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Keul C; Güth JF
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 26121970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of porcelain veneering methods on conformity of the marginal and internal fit of three-unit zirconia framework.
Suzuki S; Ueda K; Erdelt K; Watanabe F; Güth JF
Odontology; 2021 Jul; 109(3):719-728. PubMed ID: 33759088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
Schönberger J; Erdelt KJ; Bäumer D; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2629-2635. PubMed ID: 28160108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
