142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33199080)
1. The usefulness of multi voice evaluation: Development of a model for predicting a degree of dysphonia.
Lee Y; Park H; Bae I; Kim G
J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):142.e5-142.e12. PubMed ID: 33199080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Usefulness of Auditory Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis for Classifying the Voice Severity.
Lee Y; Kim G; Kwon S
J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):884-893. PubMed ID: 31104881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Usefulness of Auditory Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis as a Screening Test for Voice Problems.
Lee Y; Kim G; Sohn K; Lee B; Lee J; Kwon S
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2021; 73(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 31805562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic Psychometric Severity Index of Dysphonia (APSID): Development and Clinical Application.
Lee SJ; Choi HS; Kim H
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e19-660.e25. PubMed ID: 31810840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.
Mizuta M; Abe C; Taguchi E; Takeue T; Tamaki H; Haji T
J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):770-776. PubMed ID: 32951954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the cepstral acoustic characteristics of voice in healthy children.
Demirci AN; Köse A; Aydinli FE; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 148():110815. PubMed ID: 34217000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Cross-sectional Study of Perceptual and Acoustic Voice Characteristics in Healthy Aging.
Schultz BG; Rojas S; St John M; Kefalianos E; Vogel AP
J Voice; 2023 Nov; 37(6):969.e23-969.e41. PubMed ID: 34272139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.
Lee JM; Roy N; Peterson E; Merrill RM
J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the relationship between spectral and cepstral measures of voice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI).
Awan SN; Roy N; Cohen SM
J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 24698884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of dysphonia: cepstral analysis versus conventional acoustic analysis.
Hassan EM; Abdel Hady AF; Shohdi SS; Eldessouky HM; Din MHB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2021 Oct; 46(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 32436465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
Gillespie AI; Dastolfo C; Magid N; Gartner-Schmidt J
J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 24880672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
