142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33199080)
21. Investigation of the Cepstral Spectral Acoustic Analysis for Classifying the Severity of Dysphonia.
İncebay Ö; Köse A; Esen Aydinli F; Awan SN; Gürsoy MD; Yilmaz T
J Voice; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36725408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity.
Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee BJ; Kwon SB
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Deep learning in automatic detection of dysphonia: Comparing acoustic features and developing a generalizable framework.
Chen Z; Zhu P; Qiu W; Guo J; Li Y
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Mar; 58(2):279-294. PubMed ID: 36117378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: Comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V.
Awan SN; Roy N; Jetté ME; Meltzner GS; Hillman RE
Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Sep; 24(9):742-58. PubMed ID: 20687828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spectral-cepstral estimation of dysphonia severity: external validation.
Awan SN; Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2013 Jan; 122(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 23472315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model.
Awan SN; Roy N; Dromey C
Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Nov; 23(11):825-41. PubMed ID: 19891523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation.
Murton O; Hillman R; Mehta D
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2020 Aug; 29(3):1596-1607. PubMed ID: 32658592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses of Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia in Mandarin-speaking Chinese.
Chen Z; Li J; Ren Q; Ge P
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):333-339. PubMed ID: 29449062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of the measures of cepstral peak prominence as a measure of dysphonia severity in Spanish-speaking subjects.
Núñez-Batalla F; Cartón-Corona N; Vasile G; García-Cabo P; Fernández-Vañes L; Llorente-Pendás JL
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019; 70(4):222-228. PubMed ID: 30097163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Toward validation of the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) as an objective treatment outcomes measure.
Peterson EA; Roy N; Awan SN; Merrill RM; Banks R; Tanner K
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23809565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model.
Awan SN; Roy N
Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 16393797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The cepstral spectral index of dysphonia, the acoustic voice quality index and the acoustic breathiness index as novel multiparametric indices for acoustic assessment of voice quality.
Barsties V Latoszek B; Mathmann P; Neumann K
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Dec; 29(6):451-457. PubMed ID: 34334615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Acoustic and Perceptual Classification of Within-sample Normal, Intermittently Dysphonic, and Consistently Dysphonic Voice Types.
Gaskill CS; Awan JA; Watts CR; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):218-228. PubMed ID: 27241579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acoustic Measures of Dysphonia in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Maffei MF; Green JR; Murton O; Yunusova Y; Rowe HP; Wehbe F; Diana K; Nicholson K; Berry JD; Connaghan KP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 66(3):872-887. PubMed ID: 36802910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An Examination of Pre- and Posttreatment Acoustic Versus Auditory Perceptual Analyses of Voice Across Four Common Voice Disorders.
Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J; Lewandowski A; Awan SN
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 28688672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do Standard Instrumental Acoustic, Perceptual, and Subjective Voice Outcomes Indicate Therapy Success in Patients With Functional Dysphonia?
Reetz S; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 29395329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
