236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33199253)
1. Stakeholder Perspectives on Standardizing the Residency Application and Interview Processes.
Hammoud MM; Winkel AF; Strand EA; Worly BL; Marzano DA; Bronner BA; Forstein DA; Katz NT; Woodland MB; Morgan HK
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(4):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 33199253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives of Stakeholders About an Early Result Acceptance Program to Complement the Residency Match in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Winkel AF; Morgan HK; Akingbola O; Santos-Parker K; Nelson E; Banks E; Katz NT; Bienstock JL; Marzano D; Hammoud MM
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2124158. PubMed ID: 34633427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stakeholder Perspectives on Limiting Residency Applications and Interviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Strand EA; Winkel AF; Marzano DA; Morgan HK; Staples H; Hammoud MM
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(2):362-369. PubMed ID: 34862152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How We Do It: Student Perspectives on Changes to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Application Process.
Strand EA; Worly BL; Morgan HK; Marzano DA; Winkel AF; Bienstock J; Banks E; Katz NT; Brito LGO; Hammoud MM
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(5):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 35525780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current Communication Practices Between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicants and Program Directors.
Morgan HK; Winkel AF; George K; Strand E; Banks E; Byrne F; Marzano D; Hammoud MM
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Oct; 5(10):e2238655. PubMed ID: 36287561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants.
Cai F; Southworth E; Santiago S; Stephenson-Famy A; Fay E; Wang EY; Burns RN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 230(2):262.e1-262.e9. PubMed ID: 37839590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Away Rotations in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Survey of Program Directors.
George KE; Litman EA; Banks E; Morgan HK; Hammoud MM; Strand E
J Surg Educ; 2023 Sep; 80(9):1340-1349. PubMed ID: 37442695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixed Signals: Navigating the Obstetrics and Gynecology Signaling Initiative.
Kraus AC; Dalrymple JL; Schwartz E; Marzan G; Nelson S; Morgan HK; Hammoud MM; Young OM
J Surg Educ; 2024 Apr; 81(4):525-534. PubMed ID: 38413356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Standardized Dates for Interview Offers Mitigate Excessive Interviewing?
Santos-Parker KS; Morgan HK; Katz NT; Marzano DA; Strand EA; Winkel AF; Hammoud MM
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(4):1091-1096. PubMed ID: 33153934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the Standardized Interview Offer Date Initiatives: A Survey of Otolaryngology Applicants and Programs.
Standiford TC; Thorne MC; Chang CWD; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Aug; 169(2):267-275. PubMed ID: 36871180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Away Rotations at Integrated Thoracic Surgery Programs: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives.
Bui J; Khoury A; Long J; Haithcock B
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):1915-1922. PubMed ID: 34127425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of Behavioral Interviewing Performance With Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicant Characteristics☆?>.
Breitkopf DM; Vaughan LE; Hopkins MR
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):954-958. PubMed ID: 27321984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applicant Experience in Communication With Residency Programs After the Introduction of Program Signaling.
Schoppen Z; Morgan HK; Hammoud M; Marzano D; George K; Winkel AF
J Surg Educ; 2023 Dec; 80(12):1762-1772. PubMed ID: 37633809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advising special population emergency medicine residency applicants: a survey of emergency medicine advisors and residency program leadership.
Pelletier-Bui AE; Schrepel C; Smith L; Zhang XC; Kellogg A; Edens MA; Jones CW; Hillman E
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 20(1):495. PubMed ID: 33287824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postinterview communication with residency applicants: a call for clarity!
Frishman GN; Matteson KA; Bienstock JL; George KE; Ogburn T; Rauk PN; Schnatz PF; Learman LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):344-350.e1. PubMed ID: 25068562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.
Hammoud MM; Morgan HK; George K; Ollendorff AT; Dalrymple JL; Dunleavy D; Zhu M; Banks E; Akingbola BA; Connolly A
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2355017. PubMed ID: 38324311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors' experiences advising residency applicants.
Morgan HK; Baecher-Lind L; Bhargava R; Cox S; Everett E; Fleming A; Graziano S; Morosky C; Royce C; Sonn T; Sutton J; Sims SM
AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 Nov; 3(4):100268. PubMed ID: 37868823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual Interviews Improve Equity and Wellbeing: Results of a Survey of Applicants to Obstetrics and Gynecology Subspecialty Fellowships.
Do Tran A; Heisler CA; Botros-Brey S; Wang H; Gaigbe-Togbe B; Leegant A; Hardart A
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):620. PubMed ID: 35971126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors.
Ponterio JM; Keslar M; Lakhi NA
Med Educ Online; 2022 Dec; 27(1):2054304. PubMed ID: 35315741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
